Back

Hydrodynamics shapes self-recruitment in anemonefishes

Sato, M.; Honda, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Bernardo, L. P. C.; Bolisay, K. O.; Yamamoto, T.; Herrera, E. C.; Nakajima, Y.; Lian, C.; Uy, W. H.; Fortes, M. D.; Nadaoka, K.; Nakaoka, M.

2022-06-13 ecology
10.1101/2022.06.11.495394 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many marine species have a pelagic larval phase that undergo dispersal among habitats. Studies on marine larval dispersal have revealed a large variation in the spatial scale of dispersal, and accumulated evidence has shown that seascape patchiness is the major determinant for variation in self-recruitment. However, few studies have investigated the influence of geographic settings on marine larval dispersal. Bays or lagoons generally enhance the retention of larvae, while larvae are more likely to be flushed by strong currents in open coasts. To examine associations between larval dispersal, geographic setting, and hydrodynamics, we compared fin-scale dispersal patterns, self-recruitment, and local retention of two anemonefishes (Amphiprion frenatus and A. perideraion) between a semi-enclosed bay and an open coast in the Philippines combining genetic parentage analysis and biophysical dispersal modelling. Contrary to our expectations, parentage analysis revealed lower estimates of self-recruitment in the semi-closed bay (0-2%) than in the open coast (14-15%). The result was consistent with dispersal simulations predicting lower local retention and self-recruitment in the former (0.4% and 19%) than in the latter (2.9% and 38%). Dispersal modelling also showed that cross-shore currents toward offshore were much stronger around the semi-closed bay and were negatively correlated with local retention and self-recruitment. These results suggest that stronger cross-shore currents around the semi-closed bay transport anemonefish larvae to the offshore and mainly contributed to the lower self-recruitment. Our results highlight difficulty in predicting self-recruitment from geographic setting alone and importance of hydrodynamics on it.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.3%
2
Marine Ecology Progress Series
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
5
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
7
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
11
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Coral Reefs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
16
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
21
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
26
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological and Integrative Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
27
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%