Back

Exome-wide association studies discover germline mutation patterns and identify high-risk populations in human cancers

Shen, S.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, G.; Li, H.; You, D.; Duan, W.; Zhang, R.; Wei, Y.; Shen, H.; Hu, Z.; Christiani, D.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, F.

2022-06-16 oncology
10.1101/2022.06.11.22275897 medRxiv
Show abstract

Genome-wide association studies have discovered numerous common variants associated with human cancers. However, the contribution of exome-wide rare variants to cancers remains largely unexplored, especially for the protein-coding variants. The UK Biobank provides detailed cancer follow-up information linked to whole-exome sequencing (WES) for approximately 450,000 participants, offering an unprecedented opportunity to evaluate the effect of exome variation on pan-cancer. Here, we performed exome-wide association studies (ExWAS) based on single variant levels and gene levels to detect their associations across 20 primary cancer types in the discovery set (WES-300k, N = 284,456) and replication set (WES-150k, N = 143,478), separately. The ExWAS detected 143 independent variants at variant-level and 49 genes at gene-level, while nine variants and eight genes were shared across cancers. In the cross-trait meta-analysis, we identified 239 additional independent pleiotropic variants, mapping to the genes which were functional through trans-omics analyses in transcriptomics and proteomics. Further, we developed exome-wide risk scores (ERS) to identify high-risk populations based on rare variants with minor allele frequency (MAF) < 0.05. The ERS had satisfactory performance in cancer risk stratification, especially for the extremely high-risk persons (top 5% ERS) that were frequently risk allele carriers. The ERS (median C-index (IQR): 0.655 (0.636-0.667)) outperforms the traditional polygenic risk score (PRS) (median C-index (IQR): 0.585 (0.572-0.614)) for discrimination in the replication set. Our findings offer further insight into the genetic architecture of human exomes for cancer susceptibility.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.