How Many Hours Do Internal Medicine Residents At University Of Toronto Spend Onboarding At Hospitals Each Year? A Cross-sectional Survey Study
Hodzic-Santor, B.; Prakash, V.; Raudanskis, A.; Lorens, E.; Detsky, A. S.; Fralick, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundBurnout among medical residents is common. One source of burnout is the need to complete redundant administrative tasks such as onboarding processes at various hospitals. ObjectivesTo quantify the time residents at the University of Toronto spend onboarding at teaching hospitals, to identify areas of redundancy in onboarding processes, and to identify trainee perceptions of onboarding processes. MethodsWe conducted a quality improvement survey of core internal medicine residents at the University of Toronto where residents rotate through multiple different teaching hospitals. The primary outcome was time spent onboarding. Secondary outcomes included perceptions of the onboarding process, and impact on well-being. Results41% (N=93) of all Internal Medicine residents completed the survey. Most (n=81, 87%) rotated through at least four hospitals and 24 (26%) rotated through more than 5 in the preceding year. The median number of hours spent on the onboarding process was 5 hours per hospital (IQR 1-8) and these tasks were often completed when trainees were post-call (82%, n=76) or outside of work hours (97%, n= 90). The cumulative number of hours spent each year on onboarding tasks by the 93 trainees was 2325 hours (97 days) which extrapolates to 5625 hours (234 days) for all 225 trainees in the core internal medicine program. Most residents reported high levels of redundancy across hospital sites (n=79, 85%) and felt that their well-being was negatively affected (73%, n=68). ConclusionsThe median internal medicine resident at the University of Toronto spent 5 hours onboarding for each hospital. There is considerable redundancy and the process contributes to self-reported burnout.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impacts of lack of pocket money on undergraduate students' clinical learning activities 95%
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- An Evaluation of the Vulnerable Physician Workforce in the United States During the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic 93%
- Impact of Primary Care Team Configuration on Access and Quality of Care 93%
- Association of patients’ past misdiagnosis experiences with trust in their current physician: the TRUMP 2 -Net study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 94%
- COVID-19 Advanced Respiratory Care Educational Training Program for Healthcare Workers in Lesotho: An Observational Study 94%
- Physicians in the management and leadership of health care: A systematic review of the conditions conducive to organizational performance 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Statistical Illiteracy in Latin American Clinicians and of the Efficacy of a 10-Hour Course 95%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 95%
- Medical student residency preferences and motivational factors: a longitudinal, single-institution perspective 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Open Science Practices Among Authors Published in Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine Journals: An International, Cross-Sectional Survey 92%
- Changes in healthcare workers’ knowledge, attitudes, practices, and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
- Risk Factor Stratification for Postoperative Delirium: A Retrospective Database Study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.