Back

How Many Hours Do Internal Medicine Residents At University Of Toronto Spend Onboarding At Hospitals Each Year? A Cross-sectional Survey Study

Hodzic-Santor, B.; Prakash, V.; Raudanskis, A.; Lorens, E.; Detsky, A. S.; Fralick, M.

2022-06-14 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2022.06.10.22276103 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBurnout among medical residents is common. One source of burnout is the need to complete redundant administrative tasks such as onboarding processes at various hospitals. ObjectivesTo quantify the time residents at the University of Toronto spend onboarding at teaching hospitals, to identify areas of redundancy in onboarding processes, and to identify trainee perceptions of onboarding processes. MethodsWe conducted a quality improvement survey of core internal medicine residents at the University of Toronto where residents rotate through multiple different teaching hospitals. The primary outcome was time spent onboarding. Secondary outcomes included perceptions of the onboarding process, and impact on well-being. Results41% (N=93) of all Internal Medicine residents completed the survey. Most (n=81, 87%) rotated through at least four hospitals and 24 (26%) rotated through more than 5 in the preceding year. The median number of hours spent on the onboarding process was 5 hours per hospital (IQR 1-8) and these tasks were often completed when trainees were post-call (82%, n=76) or outside of work hours (97%, n= 90). The cumulative number of hours spent each year on onboarding tasks by the 93 trainees was 2325 hours (97 days) which extrapolates to 5625 hours (234 days) for all 225 trainees in the core internal medicine program. Most residents reported high levels of redundancy across hospital sites (n=79, 85%) and felt that their well-being was negatively affected (73%, n=68). ConclusionsThe median internal medicine resident at the University of Toronto spent 5 hours onboarding for each hospital. There is considerable redundancy and the process contributes to self-reported burnout.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.3%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.3%
4
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.3%
5
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
7
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
8
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
13
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
14
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
15
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
16
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
27
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
28
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
29
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%