Back

An end-to-end workflow based on multimodal 3D imaging and machine learning for non-destructive diagnosis of grapevine trunk diseases

Fernandez, R.; le cunff, l.; Merigeaud, S.; Verdeil, J.-L.; Perry, J.; Larignon, P.; Spilmont, A.-S.; Chatelet, P.; Cardoso, M.; Goze-Bac, C.; Moisy, C.

2022-06-10 plant biology
10.1101/2022.06.09.495457 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quantifying healthy and degraded inner tissues in plants is of great interest in agronomy, for example, to assess plant health and quality and monitor physiological traits or diseases. However, detecting functional and degraded plant tissues in-vivo without harming the plant is extremely challenging. New solutions are needed in ligneous and perennial species, for which the sustainability of plantations is crucial. To tackle this challenge, we developed a novel approach based on multimodal 3D imaging and Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based image processing that allowed a noninvasive diagnosis of inner tissues in living plants. The method was successfully applied to the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) in vineyards where sustainability was threatened by trunk diseases, while the sanitary status of vines cannot be ascertained without injuring the plants. By combining MRI and X-ray CT 3D imaging with an automatic voxel classification, we could discriminate intact, degraded, and white rot tissues with a mean global accuracy of over 91%. Each imaging modality contribution to tissue detection was evaluated, and we identified quantitative structural and physiological markers characterizing wood degradation steps. The combined study of inner tissue distribution versus external foliar symptom history demonstrated that white rot and intact tissue contents are key measurements in evaluating vines sanitary status. We finally proposed a model for an accurate trunk disease diagnosis in grapevine. This work opens new routes for precision agriculture and in-situ monitoring of wood quality and plant health across plant species.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.6%
4
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
6
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
8
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
9
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
12
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
13
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
14
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
15
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
20
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
21
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
22
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%