Back

Cognitive exertion affects the appraisal of one's own and other people's pain

Riontino, L.; Fournier, R.; Lapteva, A.; Silvestrini, N.; Schwartz, S.; Corradi-Dell'Acqua, C.

2022-06-12 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.06.09.495450 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Correctly evaluating others pain is a crucial prosocial ability, especially relevant for the healthcare system. In clinical settings, caregivers assess their patients pain under high workload and fatigue, often while dealing with competing information/tasks. However, the effect played by such cognitive strain in the appraisal of others pain remains unclear. Following embodied accounts that posit a shared representational code between self and others states, it could be hypothesized that the representation of peoples pain might be influenced by cognitive exertion similarly to first-hand experiences. Fifty participants underwent one of two demanding tasks, involving either working memory (Experiment 1: N-Back task) or cognitive interference (Experiment 2: Stroop task). After each task, participants were exposed to painful laser stimulations at three intensity levels (low, medium, high), or video-clips of patients experiencing three intensity levels of pain (low, medium, high). Participants rated the intensity of each pain event on a visual analogue scale. We found that the two tasks influenced rating of both ones own and others pain, by decreasing the sensitivity to medium and high events. This was observed either when comparing the demanding condition to a control (Stroop), or when modelling linearly the difficulty/performance of each depleting task (N-Back). We provide converging evidence that cognitive exertion affects the subsequent appraisal of ones own and likewise others pain. Healthcare personnel should be aware that high workload might alter their cognitive abilities. Perspectivethis research shows that cognitive effort aftereffects impact negatively the assessment of of medium/high pain in others, reminiscently to what was observed in first-hand experiences. Healthcare professionals should be aware that high workload and severe cognitive fatigue could affect their diagnostic skills.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.7%
3
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
7
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.5%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
10
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
21
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
27
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%