The Genetic Architecture of Morphological Scaling
Wilcox, A. S.; Vea, I. M.; Frankino, W. A.; Shingleton, A.
Show abstract
Morphological scaling relationships between the sizes of individual traits and the body captures the characteristic shape of a species, and the evolution of scaling is the primary mechanism of morphological diversification. However, we have almost no knowledge of the genetic architecture of scaling, critical if we are to understand how scaling evolves. Here we explore the genetic architecture of population-level morphological scaling relationships - the scaling relationship fit to multiple genetically-distinct individuals in a population - by describing the distribution of individual scaling relationships - genotype-specific scaling relationships that are unseen or cryptic. These individual scaling relationships harbor the genetic variation that determines relative trait growth within individuals, and theoretical studies suggest that their distribution dictates how the population scaling relationship will respond to selection. Using variation in nutrition to generate size variation within 197 isogenic lineages of Drosophila melanogaster, we reveal extensive variation in the slopes of the wing-body and leg-body scaling relationships among individual genotypes. This genetic variation reflects variation in the nutritionally-induced size plasticity of the wing, leg and body. Surprisingly, we find that variation in the slope of individual scaling relationships primarily results from variation in nutritionally-induced plasticity of body size, not leg or wing size. These data allow us to predict how different selection regimes alter scaling in Drosophila and is the first step in identifying the genetic targets of such selection. More generally, our approach provides a framework for understanding the genetic architecture of scaling, an important prerequisite to explaining how selection changes scaling and morphology.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sexually discordant selection is associated with trait specific morphological changes and a complex genomic response 95%
- Genetic and environmental canalization are not associated among altitudinally varying populations of Drosophila melanogaster 95%
- The evolution of sexual dimorphism in gene expression in response to a manipulation of mate competition 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Causes of variability in estimates of mutational variance from mutation accumulation experiments 95%
- Complexities of recapitulating polygenic effects in natural populations: replication of genetic effects on wing shape in artificially selected and wild caught populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 94%
- The relative impact of evolving pleiotropy and mutational correlation on trait divergence 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Courtship song differs between African and European populations of Drosophila melanogaster and involves a strong effect locus 92%
- Sex differences in crossover interference in house mice 92%
- Private QTLs and the Genetic Architecture of Hierarchical Size Traits: From Body Size to Sex-Specific Plasticity 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sexual selection does not increase the rate of compensatory adaptation to a mutation influencing a secondary sexual trait in Drosophila melanogaster 95%
- The maintenance of polygenic sex determination depends on the dominance of fitness effects which are predictive of the role of sexual antagonism 94%
- Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.