Back

State-dependent protein-protein interactions mediating 4-1BB CAR Signaling

Ritmeester-Loy, S. A.; Lautz, J. D.; Zhang-Wong, Y.; Gustafson, J. A.; Wilson, A. L.; Lin, C.; Gafken, P. R.; Jensen, M. C.; Orentas, R.; Smith, S. E.

2022-06-09 immunology
10.1101/2022.06.07.495180 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cells rely on activity-dependent protein-protein interactions to convey biological signals, but the state-dependent interactome is notoriously cell-specific and undercharacterized1. In the case of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells containing a 4-1BB costimulatory domain, receptor engagement is thought to trigger the formation of protein complexes similar to those triggered by T cell receptor (TCR)-mediated signaling, but the number and type of protein-interaction-mediating binding domains differ between CARs and TCRs. Here, we performed co-immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry of a 2nd generation CD19-directed 4-1BB:zeta CAR (referred to as bb{zeta}CAR) and identified 67 proteins that increased their co-association after target engagement. We compared activity-induced TCR and CAR signalosomes using quantitative multiplex co-immunoprecipitation and showed that bb{zeta}CAR engagement leads to activation of two modules of protein interactions, one similar to TCR signaling that is more weakly engaged in bb{zeta}CAR vs. TCR, and one composed of TRAF signaling complexes that is not engaged by the TCR. Batch-to-batch and inter-individual variations in IL2 production correlated with differences in the magnitude of protein network activation. Future CAR T cell manufacturing protocols could measure, and eventually control, biological variation by monitoring these signalosome activation markers. One Sentence SummaryWe define a network of protein interactions engaged by chimeric antigen receptors following target binding, and show that the magnitude of network activation correlates with IL-2 secretion, a proxy measure for CAR T cell function.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.