Back

SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces long-term TLR4-mediated synapse and cognitive loss recapitulating Post-COVID syndrome

Fontes-Dantas, F. L.; Fernandes, G. G.; Gutman, E. G.; De Lima, E. V.; Antonio, L. S.; Hammerle, M. B.; Mota-Araujo, H. P.; Colodeti, L. C.; Araujo, S. M. B.; da Silva, T. N.; Duarte, L. A.; Salvio, A. L.; Pires, K. L.; Leon, L. A. A.; Vasconcelos, C. C. F.; Romao, L.; Savio, L. E. B.; Silva, J. L.; da Costa, R.; Clarke, J. R.; Da Poian, A. T.; Alves-Leon, S. V.; Passos, G. F.; Figueiredo, C. P.

2022-06-08 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.06.07.495149 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cognitive dysfunction is often reported in post-COVID patients, but its underlying mechanisms remain unknown. While some evidence indicate that SARS-CoV-2 can reach and directly impact the brain, others suggest viral neuroinvasion as a rare event. Independently of brain viral infection, the ability of SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein to cross the BBB and reach memory-related brain regions has already been shown. Here, we demonstrate that brain infusion of S protein in mice induces late cognitive impairment and increases serum levels of neurofilament light chain (NFL), which recapitulates post-COVID features. Neuroinflammation, hippocampal microgliosis and synapse loss are induced by S protein. Increased engulfment of hippocampal presynaptic terminals late after S protein brain infusion were found to temporally correlate with cognitive deficit in mice. Blockage of TLR4 signaling prevented S-associated detrimental effects on synapse and memory loss. In a cohort of 86 patients recovered from mild COVID-19, genotype GG TLR4 -2604G>A (rs10759931) was associated with poor cognitive outcome. Collectively, these findings indicate that S protein directly impacts the brain and suggest that TLR4 is a potential target to prevent post-COVID cognitive dysfunction. One Sentence SummaryTLR4 mediates long-term cognitive impairment in mice and its genetic variant increases the risk of poor cognitive outcome in post-COVID patients.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.