"Public attitudes to sharing government data with private industry: a systematic scoping review."
Street, J.; Carter, S.; Fabrianesi, B.; Bosward, R.; Carolan, L.; Braunack-Mayer, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundLinking and analysing large volumes of health data in electronic records, datasets, registries and biobanks can provide detailed insights into the health profiles of individuals, communities, regions and national populations. Good governance for data sharing can be challenging, particularly when private sector organisations are the recipients of public sector data. Many jurisdictions have responded by instituting new regulations and laws related to data protection, responding to calls to promote data sharing and manage associated risks. This review integrates and interprets five years of research on public and patient perspectives on sharing publicly-held health data with private industry for research and development. Our review question was: what are community attitudes towards the use of government administrative health data by private industry organisations for therapeutic development? MethodsWe developed two logic grids: first, used terms describing citizens or patients, big data, private health sector and views or perspectives, second, used terms describing big data, social licence and public interest. We conducted a systematic literature search using electronic databases; PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science. Searches were conducted using Google Advanced and Google Scholar to identify grey literature ResultsA total of 6,788 articles were screened based on title and abstract. Full text screening was conducted for 224 articles and a total of 33 publications were identified. Across all studies, support for sharing administrative health data with private sector organisations was low. Background knowledge and lack of trust that data use would lead to public benefit were the most important reasons for low level of support. ConclusionPolicymakers, data custodians and companies will need to establish robust safeguards including secure storage, anonymisation, monitoring and independent oversight, and institute and implement sanctions on misuse, if they are to secure legitimacy to share publicly-held health data with private industry for research and development. Registrationnone available. Contributions to the literatureO_LIResearch shows governance for data sharing is challenging, particularly when private sector organisations are the recipients of public sector data. Globally jurisdictions have responded by instituting new regulations and laws related to data protection, data sharing and the associated risks. C_LIO_LIBringing together research on public attitudes towards the use of linked government administrative data by private sector organisations for therapeutic development, this systematic review found that public support for sharing was low. C_LIO_LIThese findings highlight key areas for policymakers, data custodians and companies to address before they can legitimately share publicly-held health data with private industry for research and development. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 94%
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 93%
- Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the United Kingdom: a discrete choice experiment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23 94%
- The challenges of replication: a worked example of methods reproducibility using routinely collected healthcare data 93%
- Wading through Molasses: A qualitative examination of the experiences, perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of Australian medical practitioners regarding medical billing 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of clinical services shapes attitudes to mental health data sharing: Findings from a UK-wide survey 93%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and well-being of people living with a long-term physical health condition: a qualitative study 92%
- Behavioural responses to Covid-19 health certification: A rapid review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Drug company methodologies used for reporting in the UK pharmaceutical industry payment transparency database between 2015-2019: A content analysis 92%
- Understanding the influence of leadership, organisation, and policy on delivering an integrated child health and social care service in community settings: A qualitative exploration using the SELFIE framework 92%
- The Amortization of Funding Gene Therapies: Making the “Intangibles” Tangible for Patients 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 94%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 92%
- Interventions To Improve Patient Safety During The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.