Back

Non-falciparum malaria infections are as prevalent as P. falciparum among Tanzanian schoolchildren

Sendor, R.; Mitchell, C. L.; Chacky, F.; Mohamed, A.; Mhamilawa, L. E.; Molteni, F.; Nyinondi, S.; Kabula, B.; Mkali, H.; Reaves, E. J.; Serbantez, N.; Kitojo, C.; Makene, T.; Kyaw, T.; Muller, M.; Mwanza, A.; Eckert, E.; Parr, J. B.; Lin, J. T.; Juliano, J. J.; Ngasala, B.

2022-06-08 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.06.07.22275625 medRxiv
Show abstract

Efforts to achieve malaria elimination need to consider both falciparum and non-falciparum infections. The prevalence and geographic distribution of four Plasmodium species were determined by real-time PCR using dried blood spots collected during the 2017 School Malaria Parasitological Survey of eight regions of Tanzania. Among 3,456 schoolchildren, 22% had P. falciparum, 24% P. ovale spp., 4% P. malariae, and 0.3% P. vivax. Ninety-one percent of P. ovale infections had very low parasite densities, based on amplification at later cycle thresholds. Sixty-four percent of P. ovale infections were single-species, and 35% of these were detected in low malaria endemicity regions. P. malariae infections were predominantly co-infections with P. falciparum (73%). P. vivax was largely detected in northern and eastern regions. Overall, 43% of children with P. falciparum were co-infected with at least one non-falciparum species. A large, previously under-appreciated burden of P. ovale spp. infection exists among Tanzanian schoolchildren. Article SummaryA previously unrecognized burden of non-falciparum malaria infections was detected among Tanzanian schoolchildren in a 2017 cross-sectional study, with P. ovale spp. prevalence comparable to P. falciparum, and low-level prevalences of P. malariae and P. vivax detected.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.