Understanding COVID-19 admissions in the UK; Analysis of Freedom of Information Requests
Jefferson, T.; Brassey, J.; Heneghan, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe progression and severity of the COVID 19 pandemic have been measured based on the daily and total numbers of cases, hospitalisations and deaths. We focused on the nature of hospitalisations from 2020 to 2022. MethodsWe analysed the role played by SARS-CoV-2 in the pandemic in the UK; we lodged FOI requests to Public Health Wales (PHW), Scotland (PHS), and Northern Ireland (PHA NI), the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) and NHS England. We asked for all-cause hospital admission monthly numbers reported by days of positivity to SARS-CoV-2 since admission from March 2020. We grouped replies by respondents. We considered any positive tests acquired from day 8 post admission as evidence of in hospital transmission. ResultsPHW, PHS and PHA NI, provided data within two months. The proportion of people admitted who became positive after eight or more days was 33% in Northern Ireland, 24% in Scotland and 45% in Wales. There are seasonal fluctuations reflecting community admissions but no evidence that the proportion of those infected in hospitals reduced over time. No authorities had viral load or symptoms data relating to their datasets. Given the limitations in PCR reporting, it is impossible to know how many "positive" cases were active. UKHSA did not hold the data, and NHS England did not clarify the content of its website. ConclusionAggregate data of "cases of Covid" in hospitals should not be used to inform policy of decision-makers until coordination, and proper interpretation of the dataset are instigated.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- First and second SARS-CoV-2 waves in inner London: A comparison of admission characteristics and the impact of the B.1.1.7 variant 94%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 93%
- Ethnic variation in outcome of people hospitalised with Covid-19 in Wales (UK): A rapid analysis of surveillance data using Onomap, a name-based ethnicity classification tool 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare-associated COVID-19 in England: a national data linkage study 96%
- Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG in healthcare workers and other staff at North Bristol NHS Trust: a sociodemographic analysis 93%
- Enhancing epidemiological investigation of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection with whole genome sequencing: A retrospective cohort study across four hospitals in the UK 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- LMIC-PRIEST: Derivation and validation of a clinical severity score for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19 in a middle-income setting 92%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 92%
- Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protective effect of a first SARS-CoV-2 infection from reinfection: a matched retrospective cohort study using PCR testing data in England 93%
- Who is dying from Covid-19 in the United Kingdom? A review of cremation authorisations from a single South Wales' crematorium. 92%
- Risk of severe outcomes among Omicron sub-lineages BA.4.6, BA.2.75 and BQ.1 compared to BA.5 in England 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Scoping Review of the Experience of Implementing Population Testing for SARS-CoV-2 93%
- Learning about COVID-19 across borders: Public health information and adherence among international travellers to the UK 91%
- Validation of a Difference-in-Differences Investigation Tool (DiD IT) for quantifying local outbreaks 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.