Back

Responsiveness of functional assessments to monitor change in balance, walking speed and strength of older adults: A systematic review of the minimal detectable change.

Arkesteijn, M.; Low, D.

2022-06-06 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2022.06.06.22276029 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesThe objective of this paper is to systematically review and evaluate the responsiveness of different functional tests via the minimal detectable change (MDC) across different older adult population cohorts. DesignSystematic review of ISI Web of Knowledge and PubMed databases were searched up to September 26th 2020. SettingCommunity dwellings, hospital and residential homes ParticipantsStudies were included if participants were adults over the age of 60. This study reports data from studies that utilise healthy community dwelling older adults, as well as older adults who are hospitalised, live in residential home or have musculoskeletal conditions. InterventionsNo interventions feature in this study Primary and secondary outcome measuresMDC reported for gait speed, grip strength, balance, timed up and go, and repeated chair stand separated per older adult sub-group were deemed the primary outcome measure. A secondary outcome measure were the results of a regression analysis, performed to determine the effect of the functional test, cohort, study design and MDC calculation methodology on MDC magnitude. ResultsThirty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Not all assessments were evaluated in the literature for all population cohorts. The MDC was affected by the functional test used, the cohort and MDC calculation methodology. ConclusionThe MDC can be assessment and population specific, and thus this should be taken into account when using the MDC. It appears acceptable that different assessors are involved in the re-assessment of the same person. Trial registrationThe systematic review protocol was published in PROSPERO (CRD42019147527). Article SummaryO_ST_ABSStrengths and Limitations of this StudyC_ST_ABSO_LIStrength: A range of assessments were included to determine if MDC could be used to prioritize specific assessments in interventions. C_LIO_LIStrength: A wide range of search criteria and methods resulting in 6448 studies being assessed that enabled the inclusion of 39 original research papers to derive 138 MDC values. C_LIO_LIStrength: Analysis of MDC95 for functional tests commonly used by practitioners to assess effective change in older adults C_LIO_LIStrength: Analyses of the impact of method design features such as different assessors on the MDC C_LIO_LILimitation: Limited to the settings and tests selected C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.