A lack of distinct cell identities in single-cell measurements: revisiting Waddington's landscape
Sparta, B.; Hamilton, T.; Hughes, S.; Deeds, E. J.
Show abstract
The prevailing interpretation of Waddingtons landscape is that attractors in gene expression space produce and stabilize distinct cell types. This notion is often applied in single-cell omics, where transcriptome data is clustered to produce models of cell types. Here we apply graph theory to characterize the distribution of cells in epigenetic space, using data from various tissues, organisms, and single-cell omics technologies. We find that cells of different types exist in the same regions of epigenetic space, with highly heterogeneous density distributions that are inconsistent with expected densities near an attractor. The lack of attractor structure could not be explained by technical noise, scale variance among genes, nor the subset of genes that were used; nor could it be rescued by any standard set of transformations. These findings pose a challenge for the robust analysis of single-cell data and open the possibility for alternative explanations of canalization during development.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrative, high-resolution analysis of single cell gene expression across experimental conditions with PARAFAC2-RISE 97%
- Conserved epigenetic regulatory logic infers genes governing cell identity 96%
- Emergence of synchronized multicellular mechanosensing from spatiotemporal integration of heterogeneous single-cell information transfer 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Dissecting reversible and irreversible single cell state transitions from gene regulatory networks 96%
- CellRegMap: A statistical framework for mapping context-specific regulatory variants using scRNA-seq 95%
- PIFiA: Self-supervised Approach for Protein Functional Annotation from Single-Cell Imaging Data 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.