Multi-task learning for single-cell multi-modality biology
Tang, X.; Zhang, J.; He, Y.; Zhang, X.; Lin, Z.; Partarrieu, S.; Bou Hanna, E.; Ren, Z.; Yang, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, N.; Ding, J.; Liu, J.
Show abstract
Current biotechnologies can simultaneously measure multi-modality high-dimensional information from the same cell and tissue samples. To analyze the multi-modality data, common tasks such as joint data analysis and cross-modal prediction have been developed. However, current analytical methods are generally designed to process multi-modality data for one specific task without considering the underlying connections between tasks. Here, we present UnitedNet, a multi-task deep neural network that integrates the tasks of joint group identification and cross-modal prediction to analyze multi-modality data. We have found that multi-task learning for joint group identification and cross-modal prediction significantly improves the performance of each task. When applied to various single-cell multi-modality datasets, UnitedNet shows superior performance in each task, achieving better unsupervised and supervised joint group identification and cross-modal prediction performances compared with state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, by considering the spatial information of cells as one modality, UnitedNet substantially improves the accuracy of tissue region identification and enables spatially resolved cross-modal prediction.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- PSICHIC: physicochemical graph neural network for learning protein-ligand interaction fingerprints from sequence data 95%
- Self-iterative multiple instance learning enables the prediction of CD4+ T cell immunogenic epitopes 94%
- INSCT: Integrating millions of single cells using batch-aware triplet neural networks 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.