Temporal and spatial segregations between phenotypes of the Diablotin Black-capped Petrel Pterodroma hasitata during the breeding and non-breeding periods
Satge, Y. G.; Keitt, B. S.; Gaskin, C. P.; Jodice, P. G. R.
Show abstract
AimDespite growing support for ecosystem-based approaches, conservation is mostly implemented at the species level. However, genetic differentiation exists within this taxonomic level, putting genetically distinct populations at risk of local extinction. In seabirds, reproductive isolation is one of the principal drivers of genetic structure. In the Diablotin Black-capped Petrel Pterodroma hasitata, an endangered gadfly petrel endemic to the Caribbean, two phenotypes have been described: a smaller dark form and a heavier light form, which are genetically distinct. We hypothesized that color forms have a similar non-breeding distribution at sea but distinct nesting distributions. LocationWestern North Atlantic and northern Caribbean islands. MethodsIn May 2019, we captured 5 adult Black-capped Petrels of each phenotype at sea and equipped them with satellite transmitters. We used generalized linear mixed models to test the importance of phenotype on geographic distribution. Using kernel density estimations, we located use areas, quantified spatial overlap between forms, and assessed form-specific exposure to marine threats. Finally, we used tracking data to estimate the distribution and timing of nesting. ResultsPetrels were tracked for 11 - 255 d (mean = 102.1 d{+/-}74.2). During the non-breeding period, all individuals ranged from 28.4 - 43.0 degrees latitude. Phenotypes had significantly distinct non-breeding distributions. In the western North Atlantic, the dark form was exposed to more marine threats than the light form. We recorded two trips (1 individual of each form) to known breeding areas, with the light form initiating breeding 1.5 months before the dark form. Main conclusionsPhenotypic differences in the Black-capped Petrel were linked to differences in nesting phenology, non-breeding marine distribution, and at-sea threat exposure. To sustain the species representation, redundancy, and resiliency in the light of environmental changes, it is likely that the evolutionary processes that resulted in genetic differentiation will also need to be conserved.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Determining the Role of Environmental Covariates on Planktivorous Elasmobranch Population Trends within an Isolated Marine Protected Area 95%
- Cross population comparison of complex migration strategies in a declining oceanic seabird 95%
- Diving efficiency at depth and pre-breeding foraging effort increase with haemoglobin levels in gentoo penguins 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial density and habitat associations of Atlantic Cod on the Northeastern US Continental Shelf 95%
- Quantifying marine larval dispersal to assess MPA network connectivity and inform future national and transboundary planning efforts 94%
- Monitoring for fisheries or for fish? Declines in monitoring of salmon spawners continue despite a conservation crisis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Climate Change, Fisheries Management, and Increases in Demersal Fish Distribution in a Southern Ocean Biodiversity Hotspot 95%
- Transient demographic dynamics of recovering fish populations shaped by past climate variability, harvest, and management 93%
- Decadal trend of plankton community change and habitat shoaling in the Arctic gateway recorded by planktonic foraminifera 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hatcheries to high seas: climate change connections to salmon marine survival 95%
- How many replicates to accurately estimate fish biodiversity using environmental DNA on coral reefs? 94%
- Both environmental conditions and intra- and interspecific interactions influence the movements of a marine predator 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.