Back

Simulation-Based Inference for Whole-Brain Network Modeling of Epilepsy using Deep Neural Density Estimators

Hashemi, M.; Vattikonda, A. N.; Jha, J.; Sip, V.; Woodman, M. M.; Bartolomei, F.; Jirsa, V.

2022-06-03 neurology
10.1101/2022.06.02.22275860 medRxiv
Show abstract

Whole-brain network modeling of epilepsy is a data-driven approach that combines personalized anatomical information with dynamical models of abnormal brain activity to generate spatio-temporal seizure patterns as observed in brain imaging signals. Such a parametric simulator is equipped with a stochastic generative process, which itself provides the basis for inference and prediction of the local and global brain dynamics affected by disorders. However, the calculation of likelihood function at whole-brain scale is often intractable. Thus, likelihood-free inference algorithms are required to efficiently estimate the parameters pertaining to the hypothetical areas in the brain, ideally including the uncertainty. In this detailed study, we present simulation-based inference for the virtual epileptic patient (SBI-VEP) model, which only requires forward simulations, enabling us to amortize posterior inference on parameters from low-dimensional data features representing whole-brain epileptic patterns. We use state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms for conditional density estimation to retrieve the statistical relationships between parameters and observations through a sequence of invertible transformations. This approach enables us to readily predict seizure dynamics from new input data. We show that the SBI-VEP is able to accurately estimate the posterior distribution of parameters linked to the extent of the epileptogenic and propagation zones in the brain from the sparse observations of intracranial EEG signals. The presented Bayesian methodology can deal with non-linear latent dynamics and parameter degeneracy, paving the way for reliable prediction of neurological disorders from neuroimaging modalities, which can be crucial for planning intervention strategies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
19.0%
2
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
3
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
4
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.9%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
10
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.0%
22
Brain Topography
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
25
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%