Molecular specification of cortico-brainstem versus corticospinal projection neurons in development
Kaiser, J.; Patel, P.; Dundar, F.; Perez-Tetuan, J.; Angira, N.; Sieger, E.; Sahni, V.
Show abstract
Skilled motor control requires precise connections between subcerebral projection neurons (SCPN) in the cerebral cortex and their appropriate subcerebral targets in the brainstem or spinal cord. The brainstem is an important motor control center and cortical projections to the brainstem serve distinct motor control functions than corticospinal projections. However, mechanisms controlling cortico-brainstem versus corticospinal projections during development remain unknown. Here, we show that the transition between the brainstem and cervical cord distinguishes cortico-brainstem from corticospinal neurons from the earliest stages of SCPN axon extension in white matter. We used high throughput single-cell RNA sequencing of FACS-purified SCPN, retrogradely labeled from either the cerebral peduncle (labeling both cortico-brainstem and corticospinal neurons) or the cervical cord (labeling corticospinal neurons only) at critical times of axon extension. We identify that cortico-brainstem and corticospinal neurons are molecularly distinct: We establish Neuropeptide Y (Npy) as specifically enriched in cortico-brainstem neurons in lateral cortex, while CART prepropeptide (Cartpt) delineates cervical-projecting corticospinal neurons. Our results highlight molecular specification of cortico-brainstem vs. corticospinal projections well before these axons reach their appropriate segmental target and suggest a broad molecular program over SCPN axon targeting to distinct subcerebral targets early in development. These findings are likely to inform future investigations of motor circuit development, as well as approaches aimed at enhancing motor recovery after central nervous system damage. HighlightsO_LICortico-brainstem neurons (CBN) limit their axon extension to supraspinal levels from the earliest time points of white matter axon extension in development. C_LIO_LICBN can be molecularly delineated from corticospinal neurons (CSN) even at these initial time points. C_LIO_LIMolecular diversification of developing subcerebral projection neurons occurs across at least two axes: cortical location (medial vs. lateral) and projection targeting specificity (brainstem vs. spinal) C_LIO_LIWithin lateral cortex, Neuropeptide Y (Npy) is expressed by CBN, while CART prepropeptide (Cartpt) expression delineates cervical-projecting CSN. C_LI O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=146 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/494253v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (38K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@48776corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1987eaeorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a50390org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18d1588_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Structure of long-range direct and indirect spinocerebellar pathways as well as local spinal circuits mediating proprioception. 97%
- Molecular organization of autonomic, respiratory, and spinally-projecting neurons in the mouse ventrolateral medulla 97%
- Circuit organization of the forelimb-related M2-to-M1 corticocortical pathway in the mouse 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cortical somatostatin interneuron subtypes form cell-type specific circuits 97%
- Bottom-up inputs are required for the establishment of top-down connectivity onto cortical layer 1 neurogliaform cells 96%
- Motor learning selectively strengthens cortical and striatal synapses of motor engram neurons 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Selective Targeting of a Defined Subpopulation of Corticospinal Neurons using a Novel Klhl14-Cre Mouse Line Enables Molecular and Anatomical Investigations through Development into Maturity 98%
- Neuronal subtypes and connectivity of the adult mouse paralaminar amygdala 96%
- A selective projection from the subthalamic nucleus to parvalbumin-expressing interneurons of the striatum 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.