Computational Identification of Ligand-Receptor Pairs that Drive Human Astrocyte Development
Voss, A. J.; Lanjewar, S. N.; Sampson, M. M.; King, A.; Hill, E.; Sing, A.; Sojka, C.; Sloan, S. A.
Show abstract
Extrinsic signaling between diverse cell types is crucial to nervous system development. Ligand binding is a key driver of developmental processes, but it remains a significant challenge to disentangle how collections of these signals act cooperatively to affect changes in recipient cells. In the developing human brain, cortical progenitors transition from neurogenesis to gliogenesis in a stereotyped progression that is influenced by extrinsic ligands. Therefore, we sought to use the wealth of published genomic data in the developing human brain to identify and then test novel ligand combinations that act synergistically to drive gliogenesis. Using computational tools, we identified ligand-receptor pairs that are expressed at appropriate developmental stages, in relevant cell types, and whose activation is predicted to cooperatively stimulate complimentary astrocyte gene signatures. We then tested a group of five neuronally-secreted ligands and validated their synergistic contributions to astrocyte development within both human cortical organoids and primary fetal tissue. We confirm cooperative capabilities of these ligands far greater than their individual capacities and discovered that their combinatorial effects converge on AKT/mTOR signaling to drive transcriptomic and morphological features of astrocyte development. This platform provides a powerful agnostic framework to identify and test how extrinsic signals work in concert to drive developmental processes. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIComputational prediction of active ligand-receptor pairs in the developing brain C_LIO_LISynergistic contributions of predicted ligands drive astrocyte development C_LIO_LILigands induce transcriptomic and morphological features of mature astrocytes C_LIO_LICooperative ligand activity converges on AKT/mTOR signaling C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- hiPSC-derived astrocytes from individuals with schizophrenia induce a dystrophic phenotype in microglial-like cells 95%
- SKAP2 as a new regulator of oligodendroglial migration and myelin sheath formation 94%
- Contributions of genetic variation in astrocytes to cell and molecular mechanisms of risk and resilience to late onset Alzheimer's disease 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- FGF8-mediated gene regulation affects regional identity in human cerebral organoids 96%
- PTBP1 Depletion in Mature Astrocytes Reveals Distinct Splicing Alterations Without Neuronal Features 95%
- An automated high-content synaptic phenotyping platform in human neurons and astrocytes reveals a role for BET proteins in synapse assembly 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lesion environments direct transplanted neural progenitors towards a wound repair astroglial phenotype 96%
- Aberrant pace of cortical neuron development in brain organoids from patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome-associated schizophrenia 96%
- Targeted Antisense Oligonucleotide Treatment Rescues Developmental Alterations in Spinal Muscular Atrophy Organoids 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Astrocytic cell adhesion genes linked to schizophrenia correlate with synaptic programs in neurons 95%
- Oxysterol-liver X receptor signaling mediates CYFIP1 regulation of cortical neurogenesis 95%
- YAP1 is a key regulator of EWS::FLI1-dependent malignant transformation upon IGF-1 mediated reprogramming of bone mesenchymal stem cells 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing the impact of sample multiplexing approaches for single-cell RNA-sequencing on downstream analysis using cerebellar organoids 94%
- Fate plasticity of interneuron specification 94%
- Post-Synaptic Density Proteins in Oligodendrocytes are Required for Activity-Dependent Myelin Sheath Growth 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.