Recessive and sex-dependent genetic effects in primary hypertension
Zucker, R.; Linial, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundEssential hypertension is a polygenic disease that affects almost half of the adult population in the USA. It is a major risk factor for renal, cerebrovascular, and cardiovascular diseases. Previous studies used UK-Biobank (UKB) GWAS results for hypertension to create a polygenic risk score (PRS), with the top and bottom 5% of the PRS translating to a 4-fold difference in the estimated risk. The heritability of hypertension is estimated to be high (30-60%), yet the underlying mechanisms and the associated genes are largely unknown. MethodsIn this study, we used a gene-based method, the proteome-wide association study (PWAS), to detect associations mediated by the effects of variants on protein function. PWAS was applied to individuals of European ancestry from the UKB, with 74,090 cases of clinical diagnosis of essential (primary) hypertension (ICD-10, I10) and 200,734 controls. PWAS aggregates the signal from all variants affecting each coding gene and provides scores for dominant, recessive, and hybrid genetic heritability. ResultsPWAS identified 70 statistically significant associated genes (FDR-q-value <0.05) and 127 genes with a weaker threshold (FDR-q-value <0.1). The overlap with GWAS summary statistics (total 1,362 genes) is only partial, with 23 and 62 genes identified exclusively by PWAS from a total of 70 and 127 genes, respectively), among them 18% were assigned recessive inheritance. Furthermore, PWAS analysis, separately performed on females and males from UKB genotyping imputed data, revealed sex-dependent genetics. There are 22 genes unique in females, with only 2 in males. We identified 6 female-specific genes that were not identified by PWAS for the entire group (70 genes). Only one associated gene (SH2B3) is shared between the sexes. Many of the female-significant genes from PWAS are enriched in cellular immunity functions. ConclusionsWe conclude that hypertension displays sex-dependent genetics with an overlooked recessive inheritance, postulating that the underlying mechanism is substantially different for males and females. Studying hypertension by a gene-based association method improves interpretability and clinical utility.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-Wide Interaction Analysis with DASH Diet Score Identified Novel Loci for Systolic Blood Pressure 96%
- Identification of the molecular components of enhancer-mediated gene expression variation in multiple tissues regulating blood pressure 95%
- UBR1 Promotes Sex-Dependent ACE2 Ubiquitination in Hypertension 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Large-scale brainstem neuroimaging and genetic analyses provide new insights into the neuronal mechanisms of hypertension 95%
- Genetic analyses of inflammatory polyneuropathy and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy identified candidate genes 93%
- Cardiovascular Disease-Associated Non-Coding Variants Disrupt GATA4-DNA Binding and Regulatory Functions 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validating and automating learning of cardiometabolic polygenic risk scores from direct-to-consumer genetic and phenotypic data: implications for scaling precision health research 95%
- Polygenic risk score portability for common diseases across genetically diverse populations 94%
- Analysis of a deeply-phenotyped familial hypercholesterolemia cohort from Mexico shows a role for both rare and common alleles across known dyslipidemia genes and reveals structural variation in a novel locus. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of putative cis-regulatory elements regulating blood pressure variation 97%
- The impact of fatty acids biosynthesis on the risk of cardiovascular diseases in Europeans and East Asians: A Mendelian randomization study 93%
- Using human genetics to understand the causes and consequences of circulating cardiac troponin I in the general population 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.