Income and race-ethnicity disparities for medical care utilization and expenditures in the United States, 2017-2019
Wetzler, H. P.; Cobb, H. W.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has focused attention on race and income disparities in SARS-CoV-2 mortality and morbidity. Much less attention has been paid to other socioeconomic factors including income. ObjectiveThe goal of this study was to compare disparities in medical care utilization and related expenditures associated with income to those associated with race and ethnicity in the US for those aged 0 to 64 for four categories of medical services: hospital, emergency room, ambulatory care, and prescription medications. MethodsWe used Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data for years 2017 through 2019. For each of the four medical services, there were three measures. First was the percentage of those aged 0-64 with or without utilization and expenditures. Due to statistical issues related to zero values for utilization and expenditures, the second and third measures were average utilization and expenditures only for those with both utilization and expenditures. Disparities by income and race-ethnicity were measured by calculating the percent difference between the group with the lowest utilization or expenditures and the group with the highest utilization or expenditures. ResultsFor 9 of the 12 separate differences the income differences exceed the corresponding race-ethnicity difference and the income differences are generally much greater in magnitude. Within the income comparisons, those on Medicaid had the greatest utilization in 7 of the 8 comparisons. The High Income group had greatest expenditures for 3 of the 4 medical services. Non-Hispanic Whites had the greatest utilization and expenditures for 9 of the 12 measures and Hispanics had the least utilization and expenditures for 9 of the 12 measures. ConclusionsThese results indicate that income inequalities are more strongly associated with medical care utilization and expenditures than race-ethnicity among those aged 0-64. Although more research should focus on income related health disparities in the United States, it is time to recognize that sound health policy must include reducing socioeconomic inequalities, especially those related to income.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The COVID-19 health equity twindemic: Statewide epidemiologic trends of SARS-CoV-2 outcomes among racial minorities and in rural America 94%
- Effect of common maintenance drugs on the risk and severity of COVID-19 in elderly patients 92%
- The Effect of Stay-at-Home Orders on COVID-19 Cases and Fatalities in the United States 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- County-Level Estimates of Excess Mortality associated with COVID-19 in the United States 93%
- Financial Hardship and Social Assistance as Determinants of Mental Health and Food and Housing Insecurity During the COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
- Life Expectancy and Voting Patterns in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in COVID-19 Risk by Race and County-Level Social Determinants of Health Among Veterans 95%
- Association between Non-Dietary Cardiovascular Health and Expenditures Related to Acute Coronary Syndrome in the US between 2008–2018 94%
- Social Class, Race/Ethnicity, and COVID-19 Mortality Among Working Age Adults in the United States 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.