Symptom variation, correlations, and relationship to physical activity in Long Covid: intensive longitudinal study
Burton, C.; Dawes, H.; Goodwill, S.; Thelwell, M.; Dalton, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundPeople with Long Covid (Post-Acute Sequelae of Covid-19) describe multiple symptoms which vary between and within individuals over relatively short time intervals. We aimed to describe the real-time associations between different symptoms and between symptoms and physical activity at the individual patient level. Methods and FindingsIntensive longitudinal study of 82 adults with self-reported Long Covid (median duration 12-18 months). Data collection involved a smartphone app with 5 daily entries over 14 days and continuous wearing of a wrist accelerometer. Data items included 7 symptoms (Visual Analog Scales) and perceived demands in the preceding period (Likert scales). Activity was measured using mean acceleration in the 3-hour periods preceding and following app data entry. Analysis used within-person correlations of symptoms pairs and both pooled and individual symptom networks derived from graphical vector autoregression. App data was suitable for analysis from 74 participants (90%) comprising 4022 entries representing 77.6% of possible entries. Symptoms varied substantially within individuals and were only weakly auto-correlated. The strongest between-subject symptom correlations were of fatigue with pain (partial coefficient 0.5) and cognitive difficulty with light-headedness (0.41). Pooled within-subject correlations showed fatigue correlated with cognitive difficulty (partial coefficient 0.2) pain (0.19) breathlessness (0.15) and light-headedness (0.12) but not anxiety. Cognitive difficulty was correlated with anxiety and light-headedness (partial coefficients 0.16 and 0.17). Individual participant correlation heatmaps and symptom networks showed no clear patterns indicative of distinct phenotypes. Symptoms, including fatigue, were inconsistently correlated with prior or subsequent physical activity: this may reflect adjustment of activity in response to symptoms. Delayed worsening of symptoms after the highest activity peak was observed in 7 participants. ConclusionSymptoms of Long Covid vary within individuals over short time scales, with heterogenous patterns of symptom correlation. The findings are compatible with altered central symptom processing as an additional factor in Long Covid.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Affect and post-COVID-19 symptoms in daily life: An exploratory experience sampling study 96%
- Characteristics of Long Covid: findings from a social media survey 93%
- Study protocol for the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-COV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE): a longitudinal study of the medium and long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Limited recovery from post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) at eight months in a prospective cohort 92%
- Virtual rehabilitation for individuals with Long COVID: a randomized controlled trial. 92%
- Symptoms persisting after hospitalization for COVID-19: 12 months interim results of the COFLOW study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Ambulatory physiological measures obtained under naturalistic urban mobility conditions have acceptable reliability 94%
- Longitudinal associations between physical activity and other health behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic: A fixed effects analysis 93%
- Chronicling menstrual cycle patterns across the reproductive lifespan with real world data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Suitability of just-in-time adaptive intervention in post-COVID-19-related symptoms: A systematic scoping review 95%
- Feasibility characteristics of wrist-worn fitness trackers in health status monitoring for post-COVID patients in remote and rural areas 92%
- Population Analysis Of Mortality Risk: Predictive Models Using Motion Sensors For 100,000 Participants In The UK Biobank National Cohort 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.