Back

Weakly supervised learning for poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma classification in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection whole slide images

Tsuneki, M.; Ichihara, S.; Kanavati, F.

2022-05-29 pathology
10.1101/2022.05.28.22275729 medRxiv
Show abstract

The endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the preferred technique for treating early gastric cancers including poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma without ulcerative findings. The histopathological classification of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma including signet ring cell carcinoma is of pivotal importance for determining further optimum cancer treatment(s) and clinical outcomes. Because conventional diagnosis by pathologists using microscopes is time-consuming and limited in terms of human resources, it is very important to develop computer-aided techniques that can rapidly and accurately inspect large numbers of histopathological specimen whole-slide images (WSIs). Computational pathology applications which can assist pathologists in detecting and classifying gastric poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma from ESD WSIs would be of great benefit for routine histopathological diagnostic workflow. In this study, we trained the deep learning model to classify poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma in ESD WSIs by transfer and weakly supervised learning approaches. We evaluated the model on ESD, endoscopic biopsy, and surgical specimen WSI test sets, achieving and ROC-AUC up to 0.975 in gastric ESD test sets for poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The deep learning model developed in this study demonstrates the high promising potential of deployment in a routine practical gastric ESD histopathological diagnostic workflow as a computer-aided diagnosis system.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
5
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
7
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
8
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
9
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
11
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
12
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
13
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
14
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
19
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
27
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
29
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%