Back

Membrane-localised mutations predict the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy

Briquez, P. S.; Hauert, S.; Goldberger, Z.; Kurtanich, T.; Alpar, A. T.; Repond, G.; Wang, Y.; Gomes, S.; Siddarth, P.; Swartz, M. A.; Hubbell, J. A.

2022-05-29 oncology
10.1101/2022.05.28.22275728 medRxiv
Show abstract

Due to their genetic instability, tumor cells bear mutations that can effectively be recognized by the immune system. In the clinic, immune checkpoint immunotherapy (ICI) can re-activate immune reactions against mutated proteins, known as neoantigens, leading to remarkable remission in cancer patients. Nevertheless, only a minority of patients are responsive to ICI, and approaches for prediction of responsiveness remain elusive yet are needed to improve the success of cancer treatments. While the tumor mutational burden (TMB) correlates positively with responsiveness and survival of patients undergoing ICI therapy, the influence of the subcellular localizations of the mutated proteins within the tumor cell has not been elucidated. Here, we hypothesized that the immune reactions are modulated by the localization of the mutated proteins and, therefore, that some subcellular localizations could favor responsiveness to ICI. We show in both a mouse melanoma model and human clinical datasets of 1722 ICI-treated patients that high membrane-localized tumor mutational burden (mTMB), particularly at the plasma membrane, correlate with responsiveness to ICI therapy and improved overall survival across multiple cancer types. We further highlight that mutations in the genes encoding for the membrane proteins NOTCH3, RNF43, NTRK3 and NOTCH1, among others, may serve as potent biomarkers to predict extended survival upon ICI in certain cancer types. We anticipate that our results will improve the predictability of cancer patient response to ICI and therefore may have important implications to establish future clinical guidelines to direct the choice of treatment toward ICI.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.6%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 5%
22.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.4%
4
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.4%
5
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
6
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
7
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
8
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.8%
9
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
10
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.4%
13
Cell Death & Differentiation
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
14
Cancer Discovery
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Cancer Immunology Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
18
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
19
EMBO Molecular Medicine
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
20
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
21
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
22
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
23
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
24
Cell Host & Microbe
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%