Back

A pharmacoepidemiological study of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in Europe

Tome, J.; Cowan, L. T.; Fung, I. C.-H.

2022-06-16 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.05.27.22275706 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo assess myocarditis and pericarditis reporting rate as adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines authorized in Europe. MethodsData on myocarditis and pericarditis related to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (period: January 1, 2021 - February 11, 2022) were collected from the EudraVigilance database and combined with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Controls (ECDC) vaccination tracker database. The reporting rate was expressed as 1 million individual vaccinated-days with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), and an observed-to-expected (OE) analysis was performed to check if there was an excess risk for myocarditis or pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. ResultsThe reporting rate of myocarditis per 1 million individual vaccinated-days in the study period was 17.27 (95% CI, 16.34-18.26) for the CX-024414 vaccine and 8.44 (95% CI, 8.18-8.70) for TOZINAMERAN vaccine. The reporting rate for pericarditis per 1 million individual vaccinated-days in the study period was 9.76 (95% CI, 9.06-10.51) for the CX-024414 vaccine and 5.79 (95% CI, 5.56-6.01) for TOZINAMERAN vaccine. The OE analysis showed that both vaccines produced a myocarditis standardized morbidity ratio (SMR) greater than 1, with the CX-024414 vaccine having a greater SMR than TOZINAMERAN. Regarding TOZINAMERAN, SMR for pericarditis was greater than 1 when considering the lowest background incidence, but smaller than 1 when considering the highest background incidence. ConclusionsOur results suggest an excess risk of myocarditis following the first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, but the relationship between pericarditis and mRNA COVID-19 vaccine remains unclear.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.