Back

Effects of LGBTQ+ Affirming Care on Uptake of Preventative Care, Management of Chronic Disease, and Aging Outcomes

McKay, T.; Tran, N.; Barbee, H.; Min, J. K.

2022-05-26 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2022.05.26.22275633 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionExperiences of discrimination and bias in health care contribute to health disparities for LGBTQ+ and other minority populations. To avoid discrimination, many LGBTQ+ people go to great lengths to find healthcare providers who they trust and are knowledgeable about their health needs. This study examines whether access to an LGBTQ+ affirming provider may improve health outcomes for LGBTQ+ populations across a range of preventive health and chronic disease management outcomes. MethodsThis cross-sectional study uses Poisson regression models to examine original survey data (n=1,120) from Wave 1 of the Vanderbilt University Social Networks, Aging, and Policy Study (VUSNAPS), a panel study examining older (50{square}76 years) LGBTQ+ adults health and aging, collected between April 2020 and September 2021. ResultsOverall, access to an LGBTQ+ affirming provider is associated with greater uptake of preventive health screenings and improved management of mental health conditions among older LGBTQ+ adults. Compared to participants reporting a usual source of care that is not affirming, participants with an LGBTQ+ affirming provider are more likely to have ever and recently received several types of preventive care, including past year provider visit, flu shot, colorectal cancer screening, and HIV test. Access to an LGBTQ+ affirming provider is also associated with better management of mental health conditions. ConclusionsInclusive care is essential for reducing health disparities among LGBTQ+ populations. Health systems can reduce disparities by expanding education opportunities for providers regarding LGBTQ+ medicine, adopting nondiscrimination policies for LGBTQ+ patients and employees, and ensuring LGBTQ+ care is included in health insurance coverage.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.6%
4
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
5
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
8
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
11
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
12
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
13
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
14
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
15
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
16
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
27
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.5%