Effects of LGBTQ+ Affirming Care on Uptake of Preventative Care, Management of Chronic Disease, and Aging Outcomes
McKay, T.; Tran, N.; Barbee, H.; Min, J. K.
Show abstract
IntroductionExperiences of discrimination and bias in health care contribute to health disparities for LGBTQ+ and other minority populations. To avoid discrimination, many LGBTQ+ people go to great lengths to find healthcare providers who they trust and are knowledgeable about their health needs. This study examines whether access to an LGBTQ+ affirming provider may improve health outcomes for LGBTQ+ populations across a range of preventive health and chronic disease management outcomes. MethodsThis cross-sectional study uses Poisson regression models to examine original survey data (n=1,120) from Wave 1 of the Vanderbilt University Social Networks, Aging, and Policy Study (VUSNAPS), a panel study examining older (50{square}76 years) LGBTQ+ adults health and aging, collected between April 2020 and September 2021. ResultsOverall, access to an LGBTQ+ affirming provider is associated with greater uptake of preventive health screenings and improved management of mental health conditions among older LGBTQ+ adults. Compared to participants reporting a usual source of care that is not affirming, participants with an LGBTQ+ affirming provider are more likely to have ever and recently received several types of preventive care, including past year provider visit, flu shot, colorectal cancer screening, and HIV test. Access to an LGBTQ+ affirming provider is also associated with better management of mental health conditions. ConclusionsInclusive care is essential for reducing health disparities among LGBTQ+ populations. Health systems can reduce disparities by expanding education opportunities for providers regarding LGBTQ+ medicine, adopting nondiscrimination policies for LGBTQ+ patients and employees, and ensuring LGBTQ+ care is included in health insurance coverage.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Financial Hardship and Social Assistance as Determinants of Mental Health and Food and Housing Insecurity During the COVID-19 Pandemic 92%
- Life Expectancy and Voting Patterns in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election 92%
- Racial Differences in Associations Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Physical, Mental, and Behavioral Health 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort Profile: A national prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic outcomes in the U.S. - The CHASING COVID Cohort Study 93%
- The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam COVID-19 exposure index: a cross-sectional analysis of the impact of the pandemic on daily functioning of older adults 92%
- Health literacy, cognitive ability and self-reported diabetes in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Loneliness and Cognitive Decline Among U.S. Adults: A Stratified Analysis of the BRFSS 94%
- Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on psychosocial factors, health, and lifestyle in Scottish octogenarians: the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 Study 94%
- Social Determinants of Healthy Aging: An Investigation using the All of Us Cohort 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of the “Muslim Ban” Executive Order on Healthcare Utilization in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota 91%
- Unhealthy lifestyle mediates the adverse effect of childhood traumas on acceleration of aging: analysis of 110,596 UK Biobank participants 91%
- Geographic and Temporal Patterns in Covid-19 Mortality by Race and Ethnicity in the United States from March 2020 to February 2022 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.