Back

Broad Recognition of Mamu-Bw4 and -A-related MHC class I Ligands by Rhesus Macaque Killer-Cell Immunoglobulin-Like Receptors

Anderson, J. L.; Sandstrom, K.; Nicholas, R. E.; Smith, W. R.; Wetzel, M.; Klenchin, V. A.; Evans, D. T.

2022-05-25 immunology
10.1101/2022.05.25.493479 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Definition of MHC class I ligands of rhesus macaque KIRs is fundamental to NK cell biology in this species as an animal model for infectious diseases, reproductive biology, and transplantation. To provide a more complete foundation for studying NK cell responses, rhesus macaque KIRs representing common allotypes of lineage II KIR genes were tested for interactions with MHC class I molecules representing diverse Mamu-A, -B, -E, -F, -I and -AG alleles. KIR-MHC class I interactions were identified by co-incubating reporter cell lines bearing chimeric KIR-CD3{zeta} receptors with target cells expressing individual MHC class I molecules and were corroborated by staining with KIR IgG-Fc fusion proteins. Ligands for 11 KIRs of previously unknown specificity were identified that fell into two general categories: interactions with multiple Mamu-Bw4 molecules or with Mamu-A-related molecules, including several allotypes of Mamu-AG and the hybrid Mamu-B*045:03 molecule. Although both groups include inhibitory and activating receptors, the majority of KIRs found to interact with Mamu-Bw4 are inhibitory, whereas most of the KIRs that interact with Mamu-AG are activating. We also identified Mamu-A1*012:01 as a ligand for KIR3DLw03*002, which belongs to a phylogenetically distinct group of macaque KIRs with a three amino acid deletion in D0 that is also present in human KIR3DL1/S1 and KIR3DL2. This study more than doubles the number of rhesus macaque KIRs with defined MHC class I ligands and identifies novel interactions with Mamu-AG, -B*045, and -A1*012. These findings support overlapping, but nonredundant, patterns of ligand recognition that reflects extensive functional diversification of these receptors.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.