Modeling Down syndrome neurodevelopment with isogenic cerebral organoids
Czerminski, J. T.; King, O. D.; Lawrence, J. B.
Show abstract
As a model of early fetal brain development in Down syndrome, this study examines cortical organoids generated from isogenic trisomic and disomic iPSC lines. Initially pools of organoids from a trisomic versus disomic line found broad transcriptomic differences and modest differences in cell-type representation, suggesting a potential neurodevelopmental phenotype due to Trisomy 21. To better control for multiple sources of variation, we undertook a very robust study of ~1,200 organoids, using an expanded panel of six isogenic subclones (three disomic and three trisomic). The power of the experimental design was indicated by exceptionally strong detection of the ~1.5-fold difference in most chr21 genes. Despite some variability in secreted A{beta}-40 levels between "identical" cell lines, this Alzheimer-related phenotype was detected as clearly correlated with Trisomy 21. However, the many statistically significant non-chr21 DEGs found in the small experiment fell away in the expanded study design, such that just three non-chr21 DEGs correlated to T21 status. Similarly, differences in cell-type representation of organoids varied somewhat between the six isogenic lines, but did not correlate with T21 status. Overall, our results indicate that even when organoid and batch variability are better controlled, common, subtle differences between isogenic cell lines (even subclones) may obscure, or be confused with, differences due to Trisomy 21. Interestingly, the neurodegenerative increase in A{beta} due to T21 was strong enough to be evident in "fetal" organoids. In contrast, any neurodevelopmental phenotype that may be present in the ~2nd trimester of DS brain development may be more subtle, and within the range of variability in neurodifferentiation potential (unrelated to Trisomy 21) of our isogenic iPSC lines. The potential significance of two non-Chr21 DEGs that results suggest correlate with T21 is discussed.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Altered patterning of interneuron progenitors in Down syndrome 96%
- Sonlicromanol improves neuronal network dysfunction and transcriptome changes linked to m.3243A > G heteroplasmy in iPSC-derived neurons 95%
- Single cell transcriptomics reveals correct developmental dynamics and high-quality midbrain cell types by improved hESC differentiation. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid and robust directed differentiation of mouse epiblast stem cells into definitive endoderm and forebrain organoids 95%
- Stable iPSC-derived NKX2-1+ Lung Bud Tip Progenitor Organoids Give Rise to Airway and Alveolar Cell Types 95%
- Sox9 and Nfi transcription factors regulate the timing of neurogenesis and ependymal maturation in dopamine progenitors 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Human Cerebral Spheroids Undergo Activity Dependent Changes In Cellular Composition And MicroRNA Expression 95%
- Characterization of mitochondrial health from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells to cerebral organoids derived from induced pluripotent stem cells 94%
- GluN2A-mediated currents and calcium signal in human iPSC-derived neurons 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A human forebrain organoid model reveals the essential function of GTF2IRD1-TTR-ERK axis for the neurodevelopmental deficits of Williams Syndrome 94%
- Asymmetric inheritance of centrosomes maintains stem cell properties in human neural progenitor cells 94%
- The histone deacetylase complex MiDAC regulates a neurodevelopmental gene expression program 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- FMR1 loss results in early changes to intrinsic membrane excitability in human cellular models 93%
- Gsx2 Regulates Oligodendrocyte Precursor Formation in the Zebrafish Spinal Cord 92%
- Cell culture system to efficiently test candidate genes and molecular pathways implicated in congenital diaphragmatic hernias 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.