Airborne Pathogen Detection in Fine Aerosol Exhaled Oral Breath Condensates
Hendersonn, J.; Mantso, T.; Ali, S.; Gross, R.; Muller, J. A.; Wilkinson, A.; Shah, K.; Usher, L.; Auld, B.; Nelson, A.; Cheung, W.; Namdeo, A.; Combrinck, M.; Hackney, P.; Turgul, V.; Jajah, E.; Athanasiou, N.; Nikolouzakis, T.; Rokka, C.; Wright, E.; Zafiropoulos, A.; Kale, I.; Smith, D.; Kofteridis, D. P.; Tsatsakis, A.; Munch, J.; Katsaounou, P. A.; Kotanidou, A.; Lagiou, P.; Magiorkinis, G.; Moschos, S. A.
Show abstract
RationaleExhaled breath condensate (EBC) promises a valuable, non-invasive, and easy to obtain clinical sample. However, its not currently used diagnostically due to poor reproducibility, sample contamination, and sample loss. ObjectiveWe evaluated whether a new, hand-held EBC collector (PBM-HALETM) that separates inertially impacted large droplets (LD) before condensing fine aerosols (FA) in distinct, self-sealing containers, overcomes current limitations. MethodsSampling consistency was determined in healthy volunteers by microbial culture, 16S phylogenetics, spectrophotometry, RT-PCR, and HILIC-MS. Capture of aerosolised polystyrene beads, liposomes, virus-like particles, or pseudotyped virus was analysed by nanoparticle tracking analysis, reporter expression assays, and flow cytometry. Acute symptomatic COVID-19 case tidal FA EBC viral load was quantified by RT-qPCR. Exhaled particles were counted by laser light scattering. Measurements and Main ResultsSalivary amylase-free FA EBC capture was linear (R2=0.9992; 0.25-30 min) yielding RNA (6.03 g/mL) containing eukaryotic 18S rRNA (RT-qPCR; p<0.001) but not human GAPDH, RNase P, or beta actin mRNA;141 non-volatile metabolites included eukaryotic cell membrane components, and cuscohygrine 3 days after cocaine abuse. Culturable aerobe viability was condensation temperature-dependent. Breath fraction-specific microbiota were stable, identifying Streptococcus enrichment in a mild dry cough case. Nebulized pseudotyped virus infectivity loss <67% depended on condensation temperature, and particle charge-driven aggregation. SARS-CoV-2 RNA genomes were detected only by forced expiration FA EBC capture, in 100% of acute COVID-19 patients. ConclusionsHigh purity, distal airway FA EBC can reproducibly and robustly inform contamination-free infectious agent emission sources, and be quantitatively assayed for multiple host, microbial, and lifestyle biomarker classes.
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeted Hybridization Capture of SARS-CoV-2 and Metagenomics Enables Genetic Variant Discovery and Nasal Microbiome Insights 92%
- Comparison of Saliva and Mid-Turbinate Swabs for Detection of COVID-19 92%
- Investigating sensitivity of nasal or throat (ISNOT): A combination of both swabs increases sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Aerosolized Hydrogen Peroxide Decontamination of N95 Respirators, with Fit-Testing and Virologic Confirmation of Suitability for Re-Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- Longitudinal and Quantitative Fecal Shedding Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2, Pepper Mild Mottle Virus and CrAssphage 92%
- Nasal microbionts differentially colonize and elicit cytokines in human nasal epithelial organoids 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A point-of-care lateral flow assay for neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 91%
- Diagnostic accuracy of swab-based molecular tests for tuberculosis using novel near point-of-care platforms: A multi-country evaluation 91%
- SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Detection Tests: test performance during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of COVID-19 vaccination 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Personal protective equipment does not sufficiently protect against virus aerosol unless combined with advanced air purification or ventilation techniques 94%
- Surface and air contamination with SARS-CoV-2 from hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Toronto, Canada 92%
- RSV Neutralizing Antibodies in Dried Blood 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.