Back

Modulation of I-wave generating pathways with repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: A TMS-EEG study

Sasaki, R.; Hand, B. J.; Semmler, J.; Opie, G. M.

2022-05-25 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.05.23.493173 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesRepetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) at indirect (I) wave intervals increases motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by TMS to primary motor cortex (M1). However, the effects of iTMS at early and late intervals on the plasticity of specific I-wave circuits remains unclear. The current study therefore aimed to assess how the timing of iTMS influences intracortical excitability within early and late I-wave circuits. To investigate the cortical effects of iTMS more directly, changes due to the intervention were also assessed using combined TMS-electroencephalography (EEG). Material and MethodsEighteen young adults (24.6 {+/-} 4.2 years) participated in four sessions in which iTMS targeting early (1.5 ms interval; iTMS1.5) or late (4.0 ms interval; iTMS4.0) I-waves was applied over M1. Neuroplasticity was assessed using both posterior-to-anterior (PA) and anterior-to-posterior (AP) stimulus directions to record MEPs and TEPs before and after iTMS. SICF at inter-stimulus intervals of 1.5 and 4.0 ms was also used to index I-wave activity. ResultsMEP amplitude was increased after iTMS (P < 0.01) and this was greater for PA responses (P < 0.01), but not different between iTMS intervals (P = 0.9). Irrespective of iTMS interval and coil current, SICF was facilitated after the intervention (P < 0.01). While the N45 produced by AP stimulation was reduced by iTMS1.5 (P = 0.04), no other changes in TEP amplitude were observed. ConclusionThe timing of iTMS failed to influence which I-wave circuits were potentiated by the intervention. In contrast, reductions in the N45 suggest that the neuroplastic effects of iTMS may include disinhibition of intracortical inhibitory processes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.