Back

Cardiac-Gated Spectroscopic Photoacoustic Imaging for Ablation-Induced Necrotic Lesion Visualization: In Vivo Demonstration in a Beating Heart

Gao, S.; Ashikaga, H.; Suzuki, M.; Mansi, T.; Kim, Y.-H.; Ghesu, F.-C.; Kang, J.; Boctor, E. M.; Halperin, H. R.; Zhang, H. K.

2022-05-24 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.05.23.492682 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is a minimally invasive therapy for heart arrhythmia, including atrial fibrillation (A-fib), which creates lesions using an electric current to isolate the heart from abnormal electrical signals. However, conventional RF procedures do not involve intraoperative monitoring of the area and extent of ablation-induced necrosis, making the assessment of the procedure completeness challenging. Previous studies have suggested that spectroscopic photoacoustic (sPA) imaging is capable of differentiating ablated tissue from its non-ablated counterpart based on PA spectrum variation. Here, we aim to demonstrate the applicability of sPA imaging in an in vivo environment, where the cardiac motion presents, and introduce a framework for mapping the necrotic lesion using cardiac-gated sPA imaging. We computed the degree of necrosis, or necrotic extent (NE), by dividing the quantified ablated tissue contrast by the total contrast from both ablated and non-ablated tissues, visualizing it as continuous colormap to highlight the necrotic area and extent. To compensate for tissue motion during the cardiac cycle, we applied the cardiac-gating on sPA data, based on the image similarity. The in vivo validation of the concept was conducted in a swine model. As a result, the ablation-induced necrotic lesion at the surface of the beating heart was successfully depicted throughout the cardiac cycle through cardiac-gated sPA (CG-sPA) imaging. The results suggest that the introduced CG-sPA imaging system has great potential to be incorporated into clinical workflow to guide ablation procedures intraoperatively.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.9%
3
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
10
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
12
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
13
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
14
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
21
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
28
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.6%