Hyperbaric Oxygen for Treatment of Long COVID Syndrome (HOT-LoCO); Protocol for a Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase II Clinical Trial
Kjellberg, A.; Abdel-Halim, L.; Hassler, A.; El Gharbi, S.; Al-Ezerjawi, S.; Boström, E.; Sundberg, C. J.; Pernow, J.; Medson, K.; Kowalski, J.; Rodriguez-Wallberg, K. A.; Zheng, X.; Catrina, S. B.; Runold, M.; Stahlberg, M.; Bruchfeld, J.; Nygren-Bonnier, M.; Lindholm, P.
Show abstract
IntroductionLong COVID, where symptoms persist 12 weeks after the initial SARS-CoV-2-infection, is a substantial problem for individuals and society in the surge of the pandemic. Common symptoms are fatigue, post-exertional malaise, and cognitive dysfunction. There is currently no effective treatment, and the underlying mechanisms are unknown although several hypotheses exist, with chronic inflammation as a common denominator. In prospective studies, hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been suggested to be effective for the treatment of similar syndromes such as chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. A case series has suggested positive effects of HBOT in Long COVID. This randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial will explore HBOT as a potential treatment for Long COVID. The primary objective is to evaluate if HBOT improves health related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients with Long COVID compared to placebo/sham. The main secondary objectives are to evaluate whether HBOT improves endothelial function, objective physical performance, and short term HRQoL. Methods and AnalysisA randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase II clinical trial in 80 previously healthy subjects debilitated due to Long COVID, with low HRQoL. Clinical data, HRQoL- questionnaires, blood samples, objective tests and activity meter data will be collected at baseline. Subjects will be randomised to a maximum of 10 treatments with hyperbaric oxygen or sham treatment over six weeks. Assessments for safety and efficacy will be performed at six, 13, 26 and 52 weeks, with the primary endpoint (physical domains in RAND-36) and main secondary endpoints defined at 13 weeks after baseline. Data will be reviewed by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board. Ethics and DisseminationThe trial is approved by The Swedish National Institutional Review Board (2021-02634) and the Swedish Medical Product Agency (5.1-2020-36673). Positive, negative, and inconclusive results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals with open access. Trial RegistrationNCT04842448. EudraCT: 2021-000764-30 Strengths and limitations of this trialStrengths O_LIRandomised placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel groups, clinical trial in compliance with ICH-GCP C_LIO_LIEvaluation of safety and efficacy, including objective and explanatory endpoints C_LIO_LIIndependent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) C_LI Limitations O_LINew syndrome with unknown mechanisms C_LIO_LIPower calculation is based on similar syndromes C_LIO_LISelection bias as patients are enrolled from the same post-COVID clinic C_LI
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- HEART rate variability biofeedback for LOng Covid symptoms (HEARTLOC): protocol for a feasibility study 96%
- CATALYST trial protocol: A multicentre, open-label, phase II, multi-arm trial for an early and accelerated evaluation of the potential treatments for COVID-19 in hospitalised adults 95%
- Effects of 12 weeks of Multi-nutrient supplementation on the Immune and Musculoskeletal systems of Older Adults in Aged-Care (The Pomerium Study): Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 95%
- Controlled evaLuation of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for COVID-19 respIraTorY disease (CLARITY): Statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled Bayesian adaptive sample size trial 94%
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- STIMULATE-ICP: A pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster randomised trial of an integrated care pathway with a nested, Phase III, open label, adaptive platform randomised drug trial in individuals with Long COVID: a structured protocol 96%
- Can a specific biobehavioral based therapeutic education program lead to changes in pain perception and brain plasticity biomarkers in chronic pain patients? A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial 95%
- Hydroxychloroquine For The Treatment Of Severe Respiratory Infection By COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Managing Endothelial Dysfunction in COVID-19: A Pilot, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial at the Lebanese American University Medical Center - Rizk Hospital (MEDIC-LAUMCRH) 94%
- Generalizability in real-world trials 92%
- Savor the flavor — a randomized double-blind study on taste-enhanced placebo analgesia in healthy volunteers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The angiotensin type 2 receptor agonist C21 restores respiratory function in COVID19 - a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial 93%
- Effectiveness of Rosuvastatin plus Colchicine, Emtricitabine/Tenofovir and a combination of them in Hospitalized Patients with SARS Covid-19 92%
- Early treatment with nitazoxanide prevents worsening of mild and moderate COVID-19 and subsequent hospitalization 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.