Background noise in an Emergency Department: an observational study from staff and patient perspectives.
Emar, M.; Smith, E.; Coats, T. J.
Show abstract
Background and importanceNoise is a contributing factor to mis-communication, poor sleep patterns and stress in healthcare. There has been little research on noise in the Emergency Department (ED). Objective(s)(1) To identify the noise levels experienced by staff and patients in different areas of an emergency department over the 24 hour cycle, (2) to examine the impact of cubicle doors on the background noise experienced by the patient, and (3) to assess the impact of monitor alarms on staff and patient noise levels. DesignObservational study. SettingA large urban teaching hospital Emergency Department. Measures and analysisUsing a standard protocol monitoring of staff and patient experience of noise was carried out in 3 areas of the ED (a resuscitation room, an area of patient cubicles with solid doors and and an area of patient cubicles with curtains). The overall distributions of noise levels in each area were described and circadian variation plotted. The proportion of time that background noise was above key cutoff values known to impair communication was calculated (45dB and 65dB). Non-parametric methods were used to compare: (1) a patient cubicle with curtains compared to a solid door, (2) having the door open or closed, and (3) staff and patient exposure a monitor alarm. Main resultsNoise was greater than 45dB for staff between 76% and 96% of the time (30% to 100% for patients). There was little difference across the 24hr cycle. A door decreased the noise experienced by patients, but only if left closed. In the resuscitation rooms monitor alarms were much louder for patients than for staff. ConclusionNoise levels likely to impair communication are present in the ED for most of the time. Staff awareness and improved design of both buildings and equipment might mitigate this negative acoustic environment.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of self-triage tools to nurse driven triage in the emergency department 92%
- The Impact of a Wireless Audio System on Communication in Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Controlled Trial 92%
- Alarm tones, music and their elements: A mixed methods analysis of reported waking sounds for the prevention of sleep inertia. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving communications in PPE: A solution for ‘landline’ telephone communication 95%
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 91%
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Short-term effects of sound localization training in virtual reality 90%
- Aerosol emission rates from playing wind instruments – Implications for COVID-19 transmission during music performance 90%
- Ambulatory physiological measures obtained under naturalistic urban mobility conditions have acceptable reliability 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Activities at King Abdulaziz University: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Perceptions 88%
- Evaluating Visual Photoplethysmography Method 88%
- Severe bandemia is not associated with increased risk for adverse events in general pediatric emergency department patients 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding good communication in ambulance pre-alerts to Emergency Department. Findings from a qualitative study of UK emergency services 91%
- Assessing the Safety of Home Oximetry for Covid-19: A multi-site retrospective observational study 91%
- Performance of the Safer Nursing Care Tool to measure nurse staffing requirements in acute hospitals: a multi-centre observational study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.