Programming the lymph node immune response with Amphiphile-CpG induces potent cellular and humoral immunity following COVID-19 subunit vaccination in mice and non-human primates
Seenappa, L. M.; Jakubowski, A.; Steinbuck, M. P.; Palmer, E.; Haqq, C. M.; Carter, C.; Fontenot, J.; Villinger, F.; McNeil, L. K.; DeMuth, P. C.
Show abstract
Despite the success of currently authorized vaccines for the reduction of severe COVID-19 disease risk, rapidly emerging viral variants continue to drive pandemic waves of infection, resulting in numerous global public health challenges. Progress will depend on future advances in prophylactic vaccine activity, including advancement of candidates capable of generating more potent induction of cross-reactive T cells and durable cross-reactive antibody responses. Here we evaluated an Amphiphile (AMP) adjuvant, AMP-CpG, admixed with SARS-CoV-2 Spike receptor binding domain (RBD) immunogen, as a lymph node-targeted protein subunit vaccine (ELI-005) in mice and non-human primates (NHPs). AMP-mediated targeting of CpG DNA to draining lymph nodes resulted in comprehensive local immune activation characterized by extensive transcriptional reprogramming, inflammatory proteomic milieu, and activation of innate immune cells as key orchestrators of antigen-directed adaptive immunity. Prime-boost immunization with AMP-CpG in mice induced potent and durable T cell responses in multiple anatomical sites critical for prophylactic efficacy and prevention of severe disease. Long-lived memory responses were rapidly expanded upon re-exposure to antigen. In parallel, RBD-specific antibodies were long-lived, and exhibited cross-reactive recognition of variant RBD. AMP-CpG-adjuvanted prime-boost immunization in NHPs was safe and well tolerated, while promoting multi-cytokine-producing circulating T cell responses cross-reactive across variants of concern (VOC). Expansion of RBD-specific germinal center (GC) B cells in lymph nodes correlated to rapid seroconversion with variant-specific neutralizing antibody responses exceeding those measured in convalescent human plasma. These results demonstrate the promise of lymph-node adjuvant-targeting to coordinate innate immunity and generate robust adaptive responses critical for vaccine efficacy.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Durability of DNA-LNP and mRNA-LNP Vaccine-Induced Immunity Against SARS-CoV-2 XBB.1.5 97%
- Heterologous immunization modulates B-cell epitope competition between helper peptides and the MPER segment in MPER/liposome vaccines 97%
- Accelerated prime-and-trap vaccine regimen in mice using repRNA-based CSP malaria vaccine 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protective mucosal immunity against SARS-CoV-2 after heterologous systemic RNA-mucosal adenoviral vector immunization 96%
- Ending transmission of SARS-CoV-2: sterilizing immunity using an intranasal subunit vaccine 96%
- Omicron-specific mRNA vaccination alone and as a heterologous booster against SARS-CoV-2 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Humoral and cellular immune memory to four COVID-19 vaccines 97%
- Mosaic sarbecovirus nanoparticles elicit cross-reactive responses in pre-vaccinated animals 96%
- Single-dose respiratory mucosal delivery of next-generation viral-vectored COVID-19 vaccine provides robust protection against both ancestral and variant strains of SARS-CoV-2 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Polymeric Pathogen-like Particles-Based Combination Adjuvants Elicit Potent Mucosal T Cell Immunity to Influenza A Virus 96%
- Combination of a Sindbis-SARS-CoV-2 spike vaccine and αOX40 antibody elicits protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2 induced disease and potentiates long-term SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and T-cell immunity 96%
- MDSC depletion during immunization with heat-killed Mycobacterium tuberculosis increases protection against BCG infection. 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.