A social media-based framework for quantifying temporal changes to wildlife viewing intensity: Case study of sea turtles before and during COVID-19
Papafitsoros, K.; Adam, L.; Schofield, G.
Show abstract
Documenting how human pressure on wildlife changes over time is important to minimise potential adverse effects through implementing appropriate management and policy actions; however, obtaining objective measures of these changes and their potential impacts is often logistically challenging, particularly in the natural environment. Here, we developed a modular stochastic model that infers the ratio of actual viewing pressure on wildlife in consecutive time periods (years) using social media, as this medium is widespread and easily accessible. Pressure was calculated from the number of times individual animals appeared in social media in pre-defined time windows, accounting for time-dependent variables that influence them (e.g. number of people with access to social media). Formulas for the confidence intervals of viewing pressure ratios were rigorously developed and validated, and corresponding uncertainty was quantified. We applied the developed framework to calculate changes to wildlife viewing pressure on loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) at Zakynthos island (Greece) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2019-2021) based on 2646 social media entries. Our model ensured temporal comparability across years of social media data grouped in time window sizes, by correcting for the interannual increase of social media use. Optimal sizes for these windows were delineated, reducing uncertainty while maintaining high time-scale resolution. The optimal time window was around 7-days during the peak tourist season when more data were available in all three years, and >15 days during the low season. In contrast, raw social media data exhibited clear bias when quantifying changes to viewing pressure, with unknown uncertainty. The framework developed here allows widely-available social media data to be used objectively when quantifying temporal changes to wildlife viewing pressure. Its modularity allowed viewing pressure to be quantified for all data combined, or subsets of data (different groups, situations or locations), and could be applied to any site supporting wildlife exposed to tourism.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A relative-motion method for parsing spatio-temporal behaviour of dyads using GPS relocation data 95%
- Analysing biodiversity observation data collected in continuous time: Should we use discrete- or continuous-time occupancy models? 94%
- BirdFlow: Learning Seasonal Bird Movements from Citizen Science Data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatio-temporal dynamics of attacks around deaths of wolves: A statistical assessment of lethal control efficiency in France 94%
- Relevance of the synergy of surveillance and populational networks in understanding the Usutu virus outbreak within common blackbirds (Turdus merula) in Metropolitan France, 2018 94%
- Using informative priors to account for identifiability issues in occupancy models with identification errors 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploiting facial side similarities to improve AI-driven sea turtle photo-identification systems 93%
- Using machine learning to count Antarctic shag (Leucocarbo bransfieldensis) nests on images captured by Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems 93%
- Comparison of Two Individual Identification Algorithms for Snow Leopards (Panthera uncia) after Automated Detection 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning goes wild: Using data from captive individuals to infer wildlife behaviour 94%
- Using virtual reality and thermal imagery to improve statistical modelling of vulnerable and protected species 93%
- Choosing optimal trigger points for ex situ, in toto conservation of single population threatened species 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.