Back

Self-generation of goal-directed choices in a distributed dopaminergic andprefrontal circuit

Bousseyrol, E.; Didienne, S.; Takillah, S.; Solie, C.; Come, M.; Ahmed Yahia, T.; Mondoloni, S.; Vicq, E.; Tricoire, L.; Mourot, A.; Naude, J.; Faure, P.

2022-05-19 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.05.19.492598 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Goal-directed choices that are not triggered by external cues arise from internal representations of the outcomes. The use of a stimulus to specify when to act, which option to take, or whether to explore, has led to consider the reward circuit as a feedforward set of modules carrying independent computations. Here, we develop an uncued task in which mice self-determine the initiation, direction, vigor and pace of their actions based on their knowledge of the outcomes. Using electrophysiological recordings, pharmacology and optogenetics, we identify a sequence of oscillations and firing in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), orbitofrontal (OFC) and prefrontal cortices (PFC) that co-encodes and co-determines self-initiation and choices. This sequence appeared with learning as an unguided realignment of spontaneous dynamics. The interactions between the structures depended on the reward context, in particular regarding the uncertainty associated with the different options. We suggest that self-generated choices arise from a distributed circuit based on an OFC-VTA core setting whether to wait or to initiate actions, while the PFC is specifically engaged by reward uncertainty to participate in both the selection and pace of actions. HighlightsO_LISelf-paced actions arise from contextual reorganization of mesocortical dynamics. C_LIO_LIVTA, PFC and OFC complementarily encode predictions and errors about outcomes. C_LIO_LIDistributed firing-then-oscillations dynamics set the goal, initiation and pace of actions. C_LIO_LIVTA and PFC antagonistically promote and inhibit motivation by reward uncertainty. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.