Gpr88 deletion impacts motivational control independently of striatal dopamine function
Spark, D. L.; Vermeulen, M. H.; Rueda, P.; Gonzalez, R. d. l. F.; Sepehrizadeh, T.; De Veer, M.; Mannoury la Cour, C.; Fornito, A.; Langiu, M.; Nithianantharajah, J.; Stewart, G. D.; Langmead, C. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundDisrupted motivational control is a common--but poorly treated--feature of psychiatric disorders. Aberrant mesolimbic dopamine signalling is implicated in motivational symptoms, however direct manipulations to these pathways have yielded suboptimal therapeutic effects. GPR88 is an orphan G protein-coupled receptor highly expressed in the striatum on medium spiny neurons, and therefore well-placed to modulate striatal signalling. While the phenotype of Gpr88 knockout mice supports a disruption of motivational pathways, it is unclear whether GPR88 is involved in reward valuation and/or effort-based decision making in a sex-dependent manner, and if this involves altered dopamine function. MethodsIn male and female Gpr88 knockout mice, we used touchscreen-based progressive ratio, with and without reward devaluation, and effort-related choice tasks to assess motivation and cost/benefit decision making, respectively. To explore whether these motivational behaviours were related to altered striatal dopamine, we quantified expression of dopamine-related genes and/or proteins, and used [18F]DOPA PET and GTP{gamma}[35S] binding to assess pre- and postsynaptic dopamine function, respectively. ResultsWe show that male and female Gpr88 knockout mice display greater motivational drive than wild-type mice, which was maintained following reward devaluation. Further, we show that cost/benefit decision making is impaired in male, but not female, Gpr88 knockout mice. Surprisingly, we found that Gpr88 deletion had no effect on striatal dopamine by any of the measures assessed. ConclusionOur results highlight that GPR88 regulates motivational control of behaviour through a dopaminergic-independent mechanism, providing further support for GPR88 as target for mood symptoms in psychiatric disorders.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Chemogenetic activation of corticotropin-releasing factor-expressing neurons in the anterior bed nucleus of the stria terminalis reduces effortful motivation behaviors 96%
- Suppression of pyramidal neuron G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+ channel signaling impairs prelimbic cortical function and underlies stress-induced deficits in cognitive flexibility 95%
- Dopamine D2 receptors in nucleus accumbens cholinergic interneurons increase impulsive choice 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Operant training for highly palatable food alters translating mRNA in nucleus accumbens D2 neurons and reveals a modulatory role of Neurochondrin 95%
- Chemogenetic activation of mesoaccumbal {Gamma}-Aminobutyric Acid projections selectively tunes responses to predictive cues when reward value is abruptly decreased 95%
- Suppression of cortico-striatal circuit activity improves cognitive flexibility and prevents body weight loss in activity-based anorexia in rats 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-cell autonomous OTX2 transcription factor regulates anxiety-related behaviors in the mouse 95%
- The serotonin 1B receptor is required for some of the behavioral effects of psilocybin in mice 95%
- Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonism Restores Phosphorylation, Trafficking and Behavior induced by a Disease Associated Dopamine Transporter Variant 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of mouse models reveals a molecular distinction between psychotic illness in PWS and schizophrenia 95%
- Reduced cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking behavior in Plcb1+/- mice 95%
- Synaptic Zn2+ potentiates the effects of cocaine on striatal dopamine neurotransmission and behavior 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.