Back

Improved deterrence of birds using an artificial predator, the RobotFalcon

Storms, R. F.; Carere, C.; Musters, R. J.; van Gasteren, H.; Verhulst, S.; Hemelrijk, C. K.

2022-05-19 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2022.05.18.492297 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Collisions between birds and airplanes, bird strikes, can damage aircrafts, resulting in delays and cancellation of flights, costing the international civil aviation industry more than 1.4 billion U.S. dollars annually. Bird deterrence is therefore crucial, but the effectiveness of all available deterrence methods is limited. For example, live avian predators can be a highly effective deterrent, because potential prey will not habituate to them, but live predators cannot be controlled with sufficient precision. Thus, there is an urgent need for new deterrence methods. To this end we developed the RobotFalcon, a device that we modelled after the peregrine falcon, a cosmopolitan predator that preys on a large range of bird species. Mimicking natural hunting behaviour, we tested the effectiveness of the RobotFalcon to deter flocks of corvids, gulls, starlings and lapwings. We compared its effectiveness with that of a drone, and of conventional methods routinely applied at a military airbase. We show that the RobotFalcon scared away bird flocks from fields immediately, and these fields subsequently remained free of bird flocks for hours. The RobotFalcon outperformed the drone and the best conventional method at the airbase (distress calls). Importantly, there was no evidence that bird flocks habituated to the RobotFalcon. We propose the RobotFalcon to be a practical and ethical solution to drive away bird flocks with all advantages of live predators but without their limitations. HighlightsO_LIWe present and test a new method of deterring of deterring birds, the RobotFalcon. C_LIO_LIThe RobotFalcon chased away flocks fast and prevented early returns. C_LIO_LIThe RobotFalcon outperformed both a drone and convential methods. C_LIO_LINo evidence of habituation to the RobotFalcon was found during the study period. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.6%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.8%
6
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
7
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
8
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.1%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
14
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
16
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
19
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
20
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%