Back

Disinhibition of Rab10 gates AMPAR insertion and spine enlargement during long-term potentiation

Wang, J.; Nishiyama, J.; Parra-Bueno, P.; Okaz, E.; Oz, G.; Liu, X.; Suponitsky-Kroyter, I.; McGraw, T. E.; Szatmari, E. M.; Yasuda, R.

2022-05-19 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.05.17.492345 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Rab-dependent membrane trafficking is critical for changing the structure and function of dendritic spines during synaptic plasticity. Here, we developed highly sensitive sensors to monitor Rab protein activity in single dendritic spines undergoing structural long-term potentiation (sLTP) in rodent organotypic hippocampal slices. During sLTP, Rab10 was persistently inactivated (>30 min) in the stimulated spines, whereas Rab4 was transiently activated over [~]5 min. Inhibiting or deleting Rab10 enhanced sLTP, electrophysiological LTP and AMPA receptor (AMPAR) trafficking during sLTP. In contrast, disrupting Rab4 impaired sLTP only in the first few minutes, and decreased AMPAR trafficking during sLTP. Thus, our results suggest that Rab10 and Rab4 oppositely regulate AMPAR trafficking during sLTP, and inactivation of Rab10 signaling facilitates the induction of LTP and associated spine structural plasticity.

Published in eLife (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 3%
30.1%
Similar papers in this journal
eLife · published here
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 11%
9.5%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Nature
○ 645 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.5%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.0%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Neuron
○ 337 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
7.0%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Nature Neuroscience
○ 252 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 7%
6.5%
8
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 7%
5.3%
9
Current Biology
○ 665 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.6%
10
Developmental Cell
○ 196 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
11
Science
● 477 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
12
Cell
○ 431 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
13
Nature Methods
○ 385 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
14
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.0%
15
The Journal of Neuroscience
● 1025 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
16
Journal of Cell Biology
● 392 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Nature Metabolism
○ 69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Nature Cell Biology
○ 118 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Cell Research
○ 51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.