Back

Pervasive gene duplications as a major evolutionary driver of coral biology

Noel, B.; Denoeud, F.; Rouan, A.; Buitrago-Lopez, C.; Capasso, L.; Poulain, J.; Boissin, E.; Pousse, M.; Da Silva, C.; Couloux, A.; Armstrong, E.; Carradec, Q.; Cruaud, C.; Labadie, K.; Le-Hoang, J.; Tambutte, S.; Barbe, V.; Moulin, C.; Bourdin, G.; Iwankow, G.; Romac, S.; Allemand, D.; Planes, S.; Gilson, E.; Zoccola, D.; Wincker, P.; Voolstra, C.; Aury, J.-M.

2022-05-19 genomics
10.1101/2022.05.17.492263 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Over the last decade, several coral genomes have been sequenced allowing a better understanding of these symbiotic organisms threatened by climate change. Scleractinian corals are reef builders and are central to these ecosystems, providing habitat and food to a great diversity of species. In the frame of the Tara Pacific expedition, we generated two coral genomes, Porites lobata and Pocillopora meandrina with vastly improved contiguity that allowed us to study the functional organisation of these genomes. We annotated their gene catalog and report a relatively higher gene number (43,000 and 32,000 genes respectively) than that found in other public coral genome sequences. This finding is explained by a high number of tandemly duplicated genes (almost a third of the predicted genes). We show that these duplicated genes originate from multiple and distinct duplication events throughout the coral lineage. They contribute to the amplification of gene families, mostly related to immune system and disease-resistance, which we suggest to be functionally linked to coral host resilience. At large, we show the importance of duplicated genes to inform the biology of reef-building corals and provide novel avenues to understand and screen for differences in stress resilience.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.