Back

Sequence Proven Reinfections with SARS-CoV-2 at a Large Academic Center

Morris, C. P.; Eldesouki, R. E.; Fall, A.; Gaston, D. C.; Norton, J. M.; Gallagher, N.; Luo, C. H.; Abdullah, O.; Klein, E. Y.; Mostafa, H. H.

2022-05-19 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.05.17.22275210 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIncreased reinfection rates with SARS-CoV-2 have recently been reported, with some locations basing reinfection on a second positive PCR test at least 90 days after initial infection. MethodsWe identified cases where patients had two positive tests for SARS-CoV-2 and evaluated which of these had been sequenced as part of our surveillance efforts, and evaluated sequencing and clinical data. Results750 patients (920 samples) had a positive test at least 90 days after the initial test. The median time between tests was 377 days, and 724 (79%) of the post 90-day positives were collected after the emergence of the Omicron variant in November 2021. Sequencing was attempted on 231 samples and successful in 127. Successful sequencing spiked during the Omicron surge and showed higher median days from initial infection compared to failed sequences (median 398 days compared to 276 days, p<0.0005). A total of 122 (98%) patients showed evidence of reinfection, 45 of which had sequence proven reinfection and 77 had inferred reinfections (later sequence showed a clade that was not circulating when the patient was initially infected). Children accounted for only 4% of reinfections. 43 (96%) of 45 infections with sequence proven reinfection were caused by the Omicron variant, 41 (91%) were symptomatic, 32 (71%), were vaccinated prior to the second infection, and 6 (13%) were Immunosuppressed. Only 2 (4%) were hospitalized, and both had underlying conditions. ConclusionSequence proven reinfections increased with the Omicron variant but generally caused mild infections.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.5%
2
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.1%
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
5
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
6
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
8
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
9
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.3%
11
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
18
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
22
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
24
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%