Back

Carbon footprint of South Dakota dairy production system and assessment of mitigation options

Naranjo, A.; Sieverding, H.; Clay, D.; Kebreab, E.

2022-05-16 systems biology
10.1101/2022.05.16.492173 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Livestock production contributes to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, there is a considerable variability in the carbon footprint associated with livestock production. Site specific estimates of GHG emissions are needed to accurately focus GHG emission reduction efforts. A holistic approach must be taken to assess the full environmental impact of livestock production using appropriate geographical scale. The objective of this study was to determine baseline GHG emissions from dairy production in South Dakota using a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach. A cradle-to-farm gate LCA was used to estimate the GHG emissions to produce 1 kg of energy-and-protein corrected milk (ECM) in South Dakota. The system boundary was divided into feed production, farm management, enteric methane emissions, and manure management as these activities are the main contributors to the overall GHG emissions. The production of 1 kg ECM in South Dakota dairies was estimated to emit 1.21 kg CO2 equivalents. The major contributors were enteric methane emissions (46.3%) and manure management (32.6%). Feed production and farm management made up 13.9 and 7.2 %, respectively. The estimate was similar to the national average but slightly higher than the California dairy system. The source of corn used in the dairies influences the footprint. For example, South Dakota corn had fewer GHG emissions than grain produced in Iowa. Therefore, locally and more sustainably sourced feed input will contribute to further reducing the environmental impacts. Improvements in efficiency of milk production through better genetics, nutrition animal welfare and feed production are expected to further reduce the carbon footprint of South Dakota dairies. Furthermore, use of feed additives and anaerobic digesters will reduce emissions from enteric and manure sources, respectively.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.