The impact of trade and investment agreements on the implementation non-communicable disease policies, 2014-2019: protocol for a statistical study
Barlow, P.; Allen, L.
Show abstract
IntroductionRegulating tobacco, alcohol, and unhealthy foods and drinks is a cornerstone of global efforts to combat the Non-Communicable Disease (NCD) pandemic, but implementation of these policies remains slow. It has been suggested that producers of these unhealthy commodities use rules in Trade and Investment Agreements (TIAs) to delay and undermine NCD policy implementation. Yet, there is no systematic empirical evidence linking TIA participation to reduced implementation. Here we present a study protocol for a statistical analysis of the relationship between TIA participation and the implementation of regulations on tobacco, alcohol, and unhealthy food and drink in 154 countries, 2014-2019. Methods and analysisWe aim to examine whether participation in TIAs with the EU and US is associated with implementation of regulations targeting tobacco, alcohol, and unhealthy food and drink. We focus on TIAs with these countries as their TIAs create multiple opportunities to contest health regulations, and a majority of the major unhealthy commodity producers are registered in these jurisdictions. Partial and full implementation is captured in a recently published dataset which systematically coded implementation of 11 NCD policies in 2014, 2016 and 2019. We will combine these outcome data with TIA membership and covariate data from multiple sources. We will calculate descriptive statistics and use both regression adjustment and matching to conduct covariate-adjusted, quasi-experimental comparisons of implementation levels and progress according to whether or not countries have a TIA with the EU or US. Further analyses and robustness checks will examine additional TIA participation arrangements and test the sensitivity of our results to our model specifications. Ethics and disseminationEthics approval will not be required as the study uses anonymised and pre-aggregated data. Findings will be disseminated to policymakers via personal contacts and press releases in parallel with scientific papers and conference presentations. FundingThis research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 related unemployment on increased cardiovascular disease in a high-income country: Modeling health loss, cost and equity 92%
- Strategies that make vaccination easy and promote autonomy could increase COVID-19 vaccination in those who remain hesitant 92%
- Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the number of new infections with COVID-19 during the first epidemic wave 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between vaccination rates and COVID-19 health outcomes in the United States: a population-level statistical analysis 91%
- Is the Healthy Start scheme associated with increased food expenditure in low-income families with young children in the United Kingdom? 91%
- The relative effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on early Covid-19 mortality: natural experiment in 130 countries 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intimate partner violence and its correlates in middle-aged and older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country secondary analysis 91%
- Drought, armed conflict and population mortality in Somalia, 2014-2018: a statistical analysis 90%
- Evolving Patterns of COVID-19 Mortality in US Counties: A Longitudinal Study of Healthcare, Socioeconomic, and Vaccination Associations 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of pausing the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine on uptake in Europe: a difference-in-differences analysis 89%
- Reach and public health implications of proposed new food marketing regulation in Germany: an updated analysis 89%
- Comparison of Healthcare costs and benefits of the UK’s Covid-19 response with four European countries: Decision Modelling Study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.