A Phase1 Results of a Non-Stabilized Spike-Encoding mRNA Vaccine in Adults
Gatechompol, S.; Kittanamongkolchai, W.; Ketloy, C.; Prompetchara, E.; Thitithanyanont, A.; Jongkaewwattana, A.; Buranapraditkun, S.; Alameh, M.-G.; Ubolyam, S.; Sophonphan, J.; Apornpong, T.; Kerr, S.; Kamarulzaman, A.; Siwamogsatham, S.; Kroon, E.; Puthanakit, T.; Patarakul, K.; Palaga, T.; Wijagkanalan, W.; Weissman, D.; Ruxrungtham, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundEffective COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are mainly available in high-income countries. ChulaCov19, a prefusion non-stabilized Spike protein-encoding, nucleoside-modified mRNA, lipid nanoparticle encapsulated vaccine development, aims to enhance accessibility of mRNA vaccine and future pandemic preparedness for low- to middle-income countries. MethodsSeventy-two eligible volunteers, 36 aged 18-55 (adults) followed by 36 aged 56-75 (elderly) enrolled in a dose escalation study of ChulaCov19 mRNA vaccine. Two doses of vaccine were given 21 days apart at 10, 25, or 50 {micro}g/dose (12/group). Safety was the primary and immunogenicity the secondary outcome. Human convalescents (HCS) and Pfizer/BioNTech vaccinees sera provided comparison panels. ResultsAll three doses of ChulaCov19 were well tolerated and elicited robust dose-dependent and age- dependent B- and T-cell responses. Transient mild/moderate injection site pain, fever, chills, fatigue, and headache were more common after the second dose. Four weeks after the second ChulaCov19: dose at 10, 25, and 50 {micro}g dose, MicroVNT-50 Geometric mean titer (GMT) against wild-type was 848, 736 and 1,140 IU/mL, respectively, versus 267 IU/mL for HCS. All dose levels elicited 100% seroconversion, with GMT ratio 4-8-fold higher than for HCS (p<0.01), and high IFN{gamma} spot-forming cells/million peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The 50 {micro}g dose induced better cross-neutralization against Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta variants than lower doses. ConclusionsChulaCov19 at 50 {micro}g/dose is well tolerated and elicited higher neutralizing antibodies than HCS with strong T-cell responses. These antibodies cross neutralized four variants of concern and ChulaCov19 has therefore proceeded to phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04566276 Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=112 SRC="FIGDIR/small/22274989v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (41K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3f6e6corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6aa1b7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9f0c29org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d75e38_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Phase 1: Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of an Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine-BBV152 97%
- Safety and immunogenicity clinical trial of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152 (a phase 2, double-blind, randomised controlled trial) and the persistence of immune responses from a phase 1 follow-up report 97%
- Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine formulations in healthy adults: a randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and efficacy of two immunization schedules with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in adults. A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial 96%
- The fourth dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine following 12 different three-dose regimens: Safety and immunogenicity to Omicron BA.4/BA.5 96%
- Immune response after SARS-CoV-2 infection with residual post COVID symptoms 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and Safety of Booster Dose of S-268019-b or Tozinameran in Japanese Participants: An Interim Report of Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study 97%
- Durability of antibody responses elicited by a single dose of Ad26.COV2.S and substantial increase following late boosting 96%
- Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Recombinant Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike: A Randomised, Comparator-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of a heterologous booster with an RBD virus-like particle vaccine following two- or three-dose inactivated COVID-19 vaccine 97%
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity against the SARS-CoV-2 variants following heterologous primary series involving CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 plus heterologous BNT162b2 booster vaccination: An open-label randomized study in healthy Thai adults 96%
- Safety and immunogenicity of PHH-1V as booster vaccination through the Omicron era: results from a phase IIb open-label extension study up to 6 months 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.