Back

Direct specification of lymphatic endothelium from non-venous angioblasts

Lupu, I.-E.; Kirschnick, N.; Weischer, S.; Martinez-Corral, I.; Forrow, A.; Lahmann, I.; Riley, P. R.; Zobel, T.; Makinen, T.; Kiefer, F.; Stone, O. A.

2022-05-18 developmental biology
10.1101/2022.05.11.491403 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The lymphatic vasculature is essential for tissue fluid homeostasis, immune cell surveillance and dietary lipid absorption, and has emerged as a key regulator of organ growth and repair1. Despite significant advances in our understanding of lymphatic function, the precise developmental origin of lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) has remained a point of debate for over a century2-5. It is currently widely accepted that most LECs are derived from venous endothelium4,6, although other sources have been described, including mesenchymal cells3, hemogenic endothelium7 and musculoendothelial progenitors8,9. Here we show that the initial expansion of mammalian LECs is driven primarily by the in situ differentiation of specialized angioblasts and not migration from venous endothelium. Single-cell RNA sequencing and genetic lineage tracing experiments in mouse revealed a population of Etv2+Prox1+ lymphangioblasts that arise directly from paraxial mesoderm-derived progenitors. Conditional lineage labelling and morphological analyses showed that these specialized angioblasts emerge within a tight spatiotemporal window, and give rise to LECs in numerous tissues. Analysis of early LEC proliferation and migration supported these findings, suggesting that emergence of LECs from venous endothelium is limited. Collectively, our data reconcile discrepancies between previous studies and indicate that LECs form through both de novo specification from lymphangioblasts and transdifferentiation from venous endothelium.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.