Back

Linking GWAS to pharmacological treatments for psychiatric disorders

Arnatkeviciute, A.; Fornito, A.; Tong, J.; Pang, K.; Fulcher, B. D.; Bellgrove, M. A.

2022-05-16 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2022.05.11.22274981 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceLarge-scale genome-wide association studies (GWASs) are expected to inform the development of pharmacological treatments, however the mechanisms of correspondence between the genetic liability identified through GWASs and disease pathophysiology are not well understood. ObjectiveTo investigate whether functional information from a range of open bioinformatics datasets can elucidate the relationship between GWAS-identified genetic variation and the genes targeted by current treatments for psychiatric disorders. Design, Setting, Participants, and ExposuresRelationships between GWAS-identified genetic variation and pharmacological treatment targets were assessed across four psychiatric disorders--ADHD, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder. Using a candidate set of 2232 genes that are listed as targets for all approved treatments in the DrugBank database each gene was independently assigned two scores for each disorder - one based on its involvement as a treatment target, and the other based on the mapping between GWAS-implicated SNPs and genes according to one of four bioinformatic data modalities: SNP position, gene distance on the protein interaction network (PPI), brain eQTL, and gene expression patterns across the brain. Main Outcomes and MeasuresGene scores for pharmacological treatments and GWAS-implicated genes were compared using a novel measure of weighted similarity applying a stringent null hypothesis-testing framework that quantified the specificity of the match by comparing identified associations for a particular disorder to a randomly selected set of treatments. ResultsIncorporating information derived from functional bioinformatics data in the form of PPI network revealed links for bipolar disorder (pperm = 0.0001), however, the overall correspondence between treatment targets and GWAS-implicated genes in psychiatric disorders rarely exceeded null expectations. Exploratory analysis assessing the overlap between the GWAS-identified genetic architecture and treatment targets across disorders identified that most disorder pairs and mapping methods did not show a significant correspondence. Conclusions and RelevanceThe relatively low degree of correspondence across modalities suggests that the genetic architecture driving the risk for psychiatric disorders may be distinct from the pathophysiological mechanisms used for targeting symptom manifestations through pharmacological treatments and that novel approaches for understanding and treating psychiatric disorders may be required. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSDo genes targeted by current treatments for psychiatric disorders match GWAS-identified genetic variation and what bioinformatic data modalities can inform these associations? FindingsInformation derived from functional bioinformatics data in the form of PPI network revealed links for bipolar disorder, however for most psychiatric disorders, the correspondence between GWAS-implicated genes and treatment targets did not exceed null expectations. MeaningGWAS-identified genetic variation driving the risk for psychiatric disorders may be distinct from the pathophysiological mechanisms influencing symptom onset and severity that are targeted by pharmacological treatments.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.