Back

Performance study of a point-of-care antigen test during the SARS-CoV-2 Delta to Omicron variant transition in the USA

Drain, P. K.; Chiklis, G.; Guest, P.; Lindner, N. M.; Ellis, J. E.

2022-05-16 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.05.11.22274962 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionConcerns have been raised regarding the accuracy of diagnostic antigen testing for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant. We compared the performance of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test between symptomatic participants recruited prospectively during the Delta to Omicron variant transition in the USA. MethodsTwo paired anterior nasal swabs were collected from each participant (adults and children) within 12 days of symptom onset between November 24th, 2021 and February 1st, 2022, during which time Omicron replaced Delta as the dominant variant in the sample population. Swabs were tested by the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test and compared using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) reference testing. Reference samples identified as positive were sequenced to identify the SARS-CoV-2 variant. Positive percent agreement (PPA) was calculated, with results stratified by RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct). ResultsOf the 38 participants for whom LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test results were available, 36 were confirmed positive by RT-PCR. Overall, PPA of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test was 94.7% (95% confidence interval: 82.3%, 99.4%) and PPA was 100% for samples with a Ct <33. Sufficient viral load for sequencing was present in nine samples (six Delta, three Omicron), all of which returned a positive result using the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test. There were no performance differences observed between participants with the Delta and Omicron variants. ConclusionsSARS-CoV-2 differences between Delta and Omicron variant mutations did not affect the performance of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test which detects the nucleocapsid protein antigen. The LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test can be a useful antigen test to diagnose emerging variants of coronavirus disease 2019.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
3
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
5
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
9
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
20
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Journal of Clinical Virology Plus
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
28
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
29
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%