Back

RNA-sequencing as an expression-informed alternative for somatic variant detection and cancer driver identification

Akutagawa, J.; Mak, A. J.; Damle, T.; Felton, C. A.; Aspden, J.; Brooks, A. N.

2026-09-30 genomics
10.1101/2022.05.10.491431 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Detecting somatic mutations is a cornerstone of cancer genomics and clinical genotyping, traditionally relying on whole exome (WES) or whole genome sequencing (WGS) data. While RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is primarily used to assess gene expression, it can also be utilized for somatic variant detection. RNA-seq inherently captures expressed variants, thereby reducing the identification of passenger mutations and mitigating the annotation biases associated with WES. We performed somatic variant calling and cancer driver detection from tumor RNA-seq data from 1,359 RNA-seq samples with matched WGS from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Our approach using RNA-seq data, alone, identified at least one putative driver gene in 15 of 16 cancer types, consistent with driver predictions from WGS. We further observed that the variant allele frequency (VAF) of RNA-seq-derived variants reflects their predicted functional impact, providing information specific to transcriptomic data. Because RNA-seq data can be generated and analyzed at lower computational cost and time than WGS or WES, it represents a resource-efficient alternative for cancer driver detection. This study provides an extensive pan-cancer resource of RNA-seq-derived variants from the PCAWG consortium and supports the utility of RNA-seq as a complementary approach for characterizing expressed somatic variation in cancer.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.