Back

Bi-Phasic Quasistatic Brain Communication for Fully Untethered Connected Brain Implants

Chatterjee, B.; Nath, M.; K, G. K.; Xiao, S.; Jayant, K.; Sen, S.

2022-10-19 biophysics
10.1101/2022.05.10.491180 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Wireless communication using electro-magnetic (EM) fields acts as the backbone for information exchange among wearable devices around the human body. However, for Implanted devices, EM fields incur high amount of absorption in the tissue, while alternative modes of transmission including ultrasound, optical and magnetoelectric methods result in large amount of transduction losses due to conversion of one form of energy to another, thereby increasing the overall end-to-end energy loss. To solve the challenge of wireless powering and communication in a brain implant with low end-end channel loss, we present Bi-Phasic Quasistatic Brain Communication (BP-QBC), achieving < 60dB worst-case end-to-end channel loss at a channel length of ~55mm, by using Electro-quasistatic (EQS) Signaling that avoids transduction losses due to no field-modality conversion. BP-QBC utilizes dipole coupling based signal transmission within the brain tissue using differential excitation in the transmitter (TX) and differential signal pick-up at the receiver (RX), while offering ~41X lower power w.r.t. traditional Galvanic Human Body Communication (G-HBC) at a carrier frequency of 1MHz, by blocking any DC current paths through the brain tissue. Since the electrical signal transfer through the human tissue is electro-quasistatic up to several 10s of MHz range, BP-QBC allows a scalable (bps-10Mbps) duty-cycled uplink (UL) from the implant to an external wearable. The power consumption in the BP-QBC TX is only 0.52 W at 1Mbps (with 1% duty cycling), which is within the range of harvested power in the downlink (DL) from a wearable hub to an implant through the EQS brain channel, with externally applied electric currents < 1/5th of ICNIRP safety limits. Furthermore, BP-QBC eliminates the need for sub-cranial interrogators/repeaters, as it offers better signal strength due to no field transduction. Such low end-to-end channel loss with high data rates enabled by a completely new modality of brain communication and powering has deep societal and scientific impact in the fields of neurobiological research, brain-machine interfaces, electroceuticals and connected healthcare.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.6%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 9%
15.2%
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
7
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.4%
8
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
9
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
11
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
12
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
15
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.8%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
19
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.5%
24
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%