Manual sub-segmentation of the cererbellum
Heinz, L.; Faber, J.; Timmann, D.; Ernst, T.; Deike-Hofmann, K.; Klockgether, T.
Show abstract
1Background1.1 AbstractThe protocol was developed in the context of generating manual sub-segmentations of the cerebellum to use as ground truth for training, validation and testing of a neural network. In this manuscript we provide methodological considerations and results of our manual sub-segmentation as well as a detailed description for manual sub-segmentation of the cerebellum into 10 hemispheric lobules and 5 vermal sub-segments as well as two cerebellar white matter labels based on a T1 weighted (T1w) MRI to foster reproducibility.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- 3 versus 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging for parcellations of subcortical brain structures 94%
- Freewater EstimatoR using iNtErpolated iniTialization (FERNET): Toward Accurate Estimation of Free Water in Peritumoral Region Using Single-Shell Diffusion MRI Data 93%
- Improved Inter-Subject Alignment of the Lumbosacral Cord for Group-Level In Vivo Gray and White Matter Assessments: A Scan-Rescan MRI Study at 3T 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- 3D segmentation of perivascular spaces on T1-weighted 3 Tesla MR images with a convolutional autoencoder and a U-shaped neural network 94%
- Exploring white matter dynamics and morphology through interactive numerical phantoms: The White Matter Generator 93%
- Neural Network-derived perfusion maps: a Model-free approach to computed tomography perfusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic quantification of brain lesion volume from post-trauma MR Images 94%
- LesionQuant for assessment of MRI in multiple sclerosis - a promising supplement to the visual scan inspection 93%
- Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative (ONDRI): Structural MRI methods & outcome measures 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.