ArcticAI: A Deep Learning Platform for Rapid and Accurate Histological Assessment of Intraoperative Tumor Margins
Levy, J.; Davis, M.; Chacko, R.; Davis, M.; Fu, L.; Goel, T.; Pamal, A.; Nafi, I.; Angirekula, A.; Christensen, B.; Hayden, M.; Vaickus, L.; LeBoeuf, M.
Show abstract
Successful treatment of solid cancers relies on complete surgical excision of the tumor either for definitive treatment or before adjuvant therapy. Radial sectioning of the resected tumor and surrounding tissue is the most common form of intra-operative and post-operative margin assessment. However, this technique samples only a tiny fraction of the available tissue and therefore may result in incomplete excision of the tumor, increasing the risk of recurrence and distant metastasis and decreasing survival. Repeat procedures, chemotherapy, and other resulting treatments pose significant morbidity, mortality, and fiscal costs for our healthcare system. Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) is used for the removal of basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma utilizing frozen sections for real-time margin assessment while assessing 100% of the peripheral and deep margins, resulting in a recurrence rate of less than one percent. Real-time assessment in many tumor types is constrained by tissue size and complexity and the time to process tissue and evaluate slides while a patient is under general anesthesia. In this study, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI) platform, ArcticAI, which augments the surgical workflow to improve efficiency by reducing rate-limiting steps in tissue preprocessing and histological assessment through automated mapping and orientation of tumor to the surgical specimen. Using basal cell carcinoma (BCC) as a model system, the results demonstrate that ArcticAI can provide effective grossing recommendations, accurately identify tumor on histological sections, map tumor back onto the surgical resection map, and automate pathology report generation resulting in seamless communication between the surgical pathology laboratory and surgeon. AI-augmented-surgical excision workflows may make real-time margin assessment for the excision of more complex and challenging tumor types more accessible, leading to more streamlined and accurate tumor removal while increasing healthcare delivery efficiency.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Deep Learning Model for Molecular Label Transfer that Enables Cancer Cell Identification from Histopathology Images 96%
- Generalizing AI-driven Assessment of Immunohistochemistry across Immunostains and Cancer Types: A Universal Immunohistochemistry Analyzer 94%
- Image-Based Consensus Molecular Subtyping in Rectal Cancer Biopsies and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of Digital Histopathology Batch Effect on Deep Learning Model Accuracy and Bias 96%
- Segmenting functional tissue units across human organs using community-driven development of generalizable machine learning algorithms 95%
- Artificial intelligence-based histopathology image analysis identifies a novel subset of endometrial cancers with distinct genomic features and unfavourable outcome 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Aggregation of Cohorts for Histopathological Diagnosis with Deep Morphological Analysis 94%
- ARA: accurate, reliable and active histopathological image classification framework with Bayesian deep learning 93%
- Spatial Transcriptomics Inferred from Pathology Whole-Slide Images Links Tumor Heterogeneity to Survival in Breast and Lung Cancer 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of an artificial intelligence-generated, explainable treatment recommendation system for urothelial carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma to support multidisciplinary cancer conferences 91%
- High-resolution 3-D imaging for precise staging in malignant melanoma 91%
- Osteosarcoma: novel prognostic biomarkers using circulating and cell-free tumour DNA 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.